This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex at milivojevic dot org>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:47:07 +0100
Subject: Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*
References: <20060103105341.pn3ne61uy4oko80w@www.milivojevic.org> <200601032019.05908.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20060103133508.z6c6xyym8wow408g@www.milivojevic.org>

> Actually, looking more closely, the libiberty.a is the only one installed
> that way (from the gcc sources).  All others (for example libstdc++.a) seem
> to follow standard convention (32 bit in lib, 64 bit in lib/sparcv9).
> Hmmm... bug in gcc-4.0.2/libiberty/Makefile.in?

Bingo. :-)  http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16513

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*
  - From: Laurent GUERBY

References:
- inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*
  - From: Aleksandar Milivojevic
- Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*
  - From: Aleksandar Milivojevic

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]