This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable?
- From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- To: Paul Schlie <schlie at comcast dot net>
- Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:06:44 -0800
- Subject: Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable?
- References: <BFDC3D4B.C8B0%schlie@comcast.net>
On Dec 31, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Paul Schlie wrote:
As although C/C++ define some expressions as having undefined
semantics;
I'd rather it be called --do-what-i-mean. :-)
Could you give us a hint at what all the semantics you would want to
change with this option? Are their any code bases that you're trying
to compile? Compilers that you're trying to be compatible with?