This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?

Richard Guenther writes:
 > On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Andrew Haley wrote:
 > 
 > > Richard Guenther writes:
 > >  > 
 > >  > So the basic question remains - is pointer overflow defined?
 > > 
 > > No.  You've already asked, and it's already been answered, with
 > > langauge from the standard.  What more do you want?
 > 
 > Well, nothing - just again clarification as there seems to be a lot
 > of confusion in this thread ;)

Well, there were a few "red herring" moments, for sure.  But the
relevant language is Section 6.5.6 which describes the + operator.
Any operands other than the ones described in that section are
undefined.

Andrew.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]