This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:02:51 +0000
Subject: Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512211332070.6048@t148.fhfr.qr> <17321.20042.386616.268799@zapata.pink> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512211351170.6048@t148.fhfr.qr> <43A959CD.1010703@adacore.com> <m3oe3as5gj.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <43A98D83.5030108@adacore.com> <m364piqot2.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <43A99A61.4090308@adacore.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512221042510.6048@t148.fhfr.qr>

Richard Guenther writes:
 > 
 > So the basic question remains - is pointer overflow defined?

No.  You've already asked, and it's already been answered, with
langauge from the standard.  What more do you want?

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]