This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| >Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> writes:
| >
| >| >However, we have an obligation to define what those mappings are.
| >| >
| >| Why?
| >
| >Because it is an implementation-defined behaviour and we have to
| >document how the choice is made.
| >
| >-- Gaby
| >
| OK, I take your word for it, I remembered this as undefined, rather than
| implementation-defined, but that's the sort of thing that is easy to
| remember wrong.
That is depressing :-/
I provided quotes in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00644.html
-- Gaby