This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
- From: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:34:47 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined?
The problem in this PR is that code like in the testcase (from OpenOffice)
assumes that pointer overflow is defined. As the standard does not talk
about wrapping pointer semantics at all (at least I couldn't find anything
about that), how should we treat this?
Thanks for any advice,
Richard.