This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Why is this C++ code incorrect?

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jiutao Nie <njt at mprc dot pku dot edu dot cn>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:22:35 +0000
Subject: Re: Why is this C++ code incorrect?
References: <200512201022.jBKALrXX026194@mprc.mprc.pku.edu.cn>

Jiutao Nie wrote:

Hi,

  Compiling the following code with g++ will report error:`static void
A::operator delete(void*)' is protected.  It's correct If B is derived from
A without "virtual".  Why does the "new B" expression need to check the
delete operator's accessibility when B is virutally derived from A?

5.3.4 paras 8, 17 and 18 say so.

nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is this C++ code incorrect?
  - From: Jim Blandy

References:
- Why is this C++ code incorrect?
  - From: Jiutao Nie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]