This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:20:05 +0100
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada
References: <20051220093441.GA18440@fencepost> <20051220093956.GA19322@adacore.com> <43A802BD.8000206@lu.unisi.ch> <20051220131008.GA76226@adacore.com> <43A803D5.9050208@lu.unisi.ch> <20051220131454.GA77003@adacore.com>

Arnaud Charlet wrote:

So you need a -gnat<something> option, or compilation fails?
You need at the very least -gnatg, although -gnatpg is highly recommended,
and -gnata is highly desirable for development

Ok. For now I'd stick with the patch I proposed to Andreas, but please tell me if these assertions are right or wrong:

-gnatpg is equivalent to -gnatg -gnatp.

-gnatg is necessary for compilation, and it could be moved out of ADAFLAGS into the rule. ADAFLAGS would then mention only -gnatp -gnata.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

References:
- Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada
  - From: Bonzini
- Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]