This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Jurij Rosenthal <jurij dot rosenthal at chipvision dot com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:22:07 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements
References: <4395CC7A.6030206@chipvision.com> <87mzjekszm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <17301.53686.614126.694276@zapata.pink> <200512061310.43872.dnovillo@redhat.com>

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Yes, they're collectively pretty clueless.  However, in the midst of 
> that /. interchange I did see one posting that made a relatively good 
> point: If you go to gcc.gnu.org, you will see "Current release series:  
> GCC 4.1.0".
> 
> For the uninformed, that may be construed as "GCC 4.1.0 has been released".  
> That may have tripped the original /. poster into thinking that.  No, I'm 
> not defending them.

That's not just for the uninformed, I consider this a real bug with our 
web pages

Gerald

References:
- Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements
  - From: Jurij Rosenthal
- Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]