This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:52:33 -0800
Subject: Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
References: <SERRANO6qCvOeyYHeFu00000084@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <1132674761.27134.177.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <8C2BE826-8925-45CA-AAE7-EF2F673B2819@apple.com> <1133175654.32658.11.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <438AE644.7000704@adacore.com> <11FD84E7-060B-44C3-BBD9-07BDA71C8301@apple.com> <438B5504.1000600@adacore.com>

On Nov 28, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Robert Dewar wrote:

Right, I agree, I was answering whether this can ever be done
legitimately, and the answer is really no, it is undefined in
C

It is not.

References:
- RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
  - From: Dave Korn
- RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]