This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault

On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:32:45PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> what happens w/ -fstack-protector-all -fstack-protector (in this order) ? 
> do we have (2) or (1)

We have 1.

> so now it does
> -fstack-protector #define __SSP__ 1 ; #undef __SSP_ALL__
> -fstack-protector-all #define __SSP_ALL__ 2 ; #undef __SSP__
> 
> and the last wins.

I don't know what you're looking at, but it isn't mainline.
The defines are not controled this way.


r~
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]