This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3


Richard Guenther wrote:

>That works, if only code playing well (or failing with SIGILL) with
>either locking scheme is ever inlined.  I.e. for x86 you cannot inline
>the i386 variant.
>
Indeed, we are in perfect agreement now. The point is exactly that: the
i386 version cannot be inlined, can only be out of line inside libgcc,
in this theoretical scheme.

Really, I think it can pretty much robust.

>  If such
>simple rule is possible on other architectures affected is beyond my knowledge.
>And of course currently libgcc is not clever enough in the sense of Uli.
>
Eh ;)

Paolo.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]