This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -Wuninitialized issues

From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caipclassic dot rutgers dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:53:07 -0700
Subject: Re: -Wuninitialized issues
References: <4365CA5E.3070401@codesourcery.com> <200511030004.jA304n0n022702@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <1130977183.29507.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200511021929.37710.dnovillo@redhat.com> <43695D21.7080807@codesourcery.com>
Reply-to: law at redhat dot com

On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 16:43 -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Jeff, I'm sorry you're upset; I actually think we're closer to consensus
> than we've ever been before on this issue. :-)
Maybe that's what's getting under my skin!  Rehashing those
issues where I think we do have a consensus, namely the need
to provide users with a way to generate these warnings :-)

I haven't seen anyone say we shouldn't try to produce these
warnings, quite the opposite.


jeff

References:
- Re: -Wuninitialized issues
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: -Wuninitialized issues
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: -Wuninitialized issues
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: -Wuninitialized issues
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]