This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -Wuninitialized issues

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: law at redhat dot com
Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caipclassic dot rutgers dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:29:37 -0500
Subject: Re: -Wuninitialized issues
References: <4365CA5E.3070401@codesourcery.com> <200511030004.jA304n0n022702@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <1130977183.29507.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wednesday 02 November 2005 19:19, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

> What we're in disagreement about is whether or not that class of
> warnings should be triggered by -Wuninitialized.  I STRONGLY believe
> that -Wuninitialized should remain as-is in its documented behavior
> and that we should have a distinct switch to get the new behavior.
>
Agreed 100%.  My vote is to use your proposal for -Wuninitialized and have, 
as you said, another flag that does the analysis immediately after going 
into SSA, before any transformations are done.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -Wuninitialized issues
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: -Wuninitialized issues
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: -Wuninitialized issues
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]