This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: insufficient inline optimisation?

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
To: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
Cc: Anthony Shipman <als at iinet dot net dot au>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:49:28 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: insufficient inline optimisation?
References: <200511012307.39761.als@iinet.net.au> <6044039.1130847305820.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@imap-dhs.suse.de> <87fyqgcy8o.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

On Nov 01, 2005 02:07 PM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:

> * Steven Bosscher:
>
> >> I think that the optimiser should get rid of the loop once it has
> >> got
> >> rid of
> >> the body!
>
> > I don't think so.Â This kind of thing is optimized away by gcc 4.1
> > already.
>
> Shouldn't this be listed in the changes.html file?

Go ahead and propose a patch! ;-)
Â
Gr.
Steven
Â


Steven Bosscher
SUSE Labs

References:
- insufficient inline optimisation?
  - From: Anthony Shipman
- Re: insufficient inline optimisation?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: insufficient inline optimisation?
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]