This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings

From: Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>
To: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>,gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>,GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:33:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings
References: <43655C8C.20403@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510310005070.11664@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <43660C20.2010103@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:20:48PM +0100, FX Coudert wrote:

> New version of the patch attached, to answer Joseph's remark.

Actually, no :-)

>   What should "gfortran -fdollar-ok a.f b.c" do, if -fdollar-ok if a 
> fortran-only option?

It shouldn't pass -fdollar-ok to cc1, IMHO.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings
  - From: FX Coudert

References:
- [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings
  - From: FX Coudert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]