This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Use of Bugzilla fields

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 14:01:29 -0800
Subject: Re: Use of Bugzilla fields
References: <43653E2C.8020000@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510302148410.11664@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Joseph S. Myers wrote:

> Does this mean regressions for languages and platforms other than those in 
> the release criteria should now have the milestone set, but be marked as 
> P4 or P5?

Yes, as P5.  But, I don't intend to try to go back and find those that
are already unmarked, and "fix" the milestone.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- Use of Bugzilla fields
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Use of Bugzilla fields
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]