[Fwd: GCC 4.0 bug]

[Patrick Bennett <patrick dot bennett at inin dot com>]

I'm forwarding this message from a coworker.
He ran into this regression bug with GCC 4.0.1 (it works correctly in 
3.4.1).
The conditional operator expression isn't handling static consts 
correctly resulting in linker errors since it is trying to resolve to 
statics that were never defined.

struct Foo
{
   static const int    a   = 1;
   static const int    b   = 2;
};


inline  void    foo(bool v)
{
   std::cout << ((v) ? (Foo::a) : (Foo::b));
}


_Z3foob:
.LFB1425:
       .file 1 "foo.cpp"
       .loc 1 10 0
       pushl   %ebp
.LCFI0:
       movl    %esp, %ebp
.LCFI1:
       subl    $24, %esp
.LCFI2:
       movl    8(%ebp), %eax
       movb    %al, -4(%ebp)
.LBB2:
       .loc 1 12 0
       cmpb    $0, -4(%ebp)
       je      .L2
       movl    _ZN3Foo1aE, %eax
       movl    %eax, -8(%ebp)
       jmp     .L4
.L2:
       movl    _ZN3Foo1bE, %eax
       movl    %eax, -8(%ebp)
.L4:
       movl    -8(%ebp), %eax
       movl    %eax, 4(%esp)
       movl    $_ZSt4cout, (%esp)
       call    _ZNSolsEi
.LBE2:
       .loc 1 13 0
       leave
       ret
.LFE1425:
       .size   _Z3foob, .-_Z3foob


No declaration of _ZN3Foo1aE and _ZN3Foo1bE.


Changed Foo to:

struct Foo
{
   static const int    a;
   static const int    b;
};

const int   Foo::a  = 1;
const int   Foo::b  = 2;


Assembly of function the same, but in addition:

.globl _ZN3Foo1bE
       .section        .rodata
       .align 4
       .type   _ZN3Foo1bE, @object
       .size   _ZN3Foo1bE, 4
_ZN3Foo1bE:
       .long   2
.globl _ZN3Foo1aE
       .align 4
       .type   _ZN3Foo1aE, @object
       .size   _ZN3Foo1aE, 4
_ZN3Foo1aE:
       .long   1



Thanks,
Patrick Bennett