This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A couple more subversion notes
Daniel Berlin writes:
> On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 17:40 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> >
> > >I'll add others:
> > >
> > >I would also notice that most people don't RTFM. I spent many efforts in
> > >writing the Wiki page, and the benefits of SVN are apparent if you spend
> > >some time reading it and studying the thing a little. To make things better,
> > >something *has* to change. You can't expect SVN to be *identical* to CVS,
> > >but it's very very close.
> > >
> > >
> > Agreed, many thanks both to you and Steven.
> >
> > Only one request from me: before the switch takes place, can you make
> > sure the instructions on the wiki are sufficiently complete and
> > incorporate all the latest advices about performance and so on? I think
> > this is an high priority and would even suggest delaying the switch if
> > we don't have those docs ready.
>
> Well i guess i should aks the harsh question, which is, are these
> advantages enough for you guys, or should we just not move?
>
> Again, there are invariably some pains associated with any switch in
> workflow :)
I've been browsing gcc change sets, and I have to say it's very nice
feature!
I'm in favour of the change if we can get a decent ssh tunnelling
solution sorted out so that "svn diff" is decently fast.
Andrew.