This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions

From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:47:33 -0700
Subject: Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions
References: <7856.1129540865705.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@imap-dhs.suse.de> <20051017150057.GA30111@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <43542812.1030901@wanadoo.fr>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote:
> Have you made any progress on fixing this?  I would rather that the 
> debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken.

My mind is going.  After checking 4 or 5 different trees wondering
where the patch is, I noticed that I've checked it in already.

2005-10-15  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>

        * gimplify.c (gimplify_var_or_parm_decl): Split out from ...
        (gimplify_expr): ... here.
        (gimplify_compound_lval): Use it in initial scan loop.  Allow
        fb_lvalue in base expression.

If it's still not fixed, I guess I'll have to look again...


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]