This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Final Subversion testing this week
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 16 Oct 2005 14:32:31 -0700
- Subject: Re: Final Subversion testing this week
- References: <1129491302.7552.14.camel@linux.site><jefyr1b4f6.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
> Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
>
> > CVS write access users should give the subversion setup a try this week.
>
> Is there a branch that represents the tip of the old-gcc repository? It
> appears that premerge-fsf-branch is intented to be this, but it is missing
> many files from old-gcc repository.
Yes, premerge-fsf-branch is supposed to be a branch holding all
revisions of files changed at the FSF sources after the merge from the
FSF sources into the EGCS sources.
Now I see that I failed to add the branch tag to files in old-gcc
which were not modified after the merge. I updated the cvs sources on
gccmerge-branch, and regenerated /pool/ian/repo. I tested a checkout
of premerge-fsf-branch, and the only differences I saw were due to RCS
keyword expansion.
Hopefully Danny can incorporate this change into the final subversion
conversion.
Thanks for noticing.
Ian