This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Ada question about PR 18434
- From: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- To: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
- Cc: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 14:06:05 +0200 (MEST)
- Subject: Re: Ada question about PR 18434
- References: <1128112128.12250.124.camel@pc.site>
Laurent GUERBY writes:
> If I'm guessing correctly there are two solutions:
>
> 1/ Remove the default initialization in ada/osint.adb
> - Running_Program : Program_Type := Unspecified;
> + pragma Warnings (Off);
> + Running_Program : Program_Type;
> + pragma Warnings (On);
>
> This is not a long term solution, but local and should fix the problem
> if my hypothesis is correct, Rainer could you try this one?
I did, and for the first time for any 4.x version, the current 4.0 branch
bootstrapped successfully on alpha-dec-osf5.1b :-)
Testsuite results are here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-10/msg00190.html
and Ada doesn't look too bad compared to my last 3.4 branch results of
20050606:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg00587.html
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c250002
-FAIL: c37213f
-FAIL: c37215f
-FAIL: c380004
+FAIL: c456001
FAIL: c45624a
FAIL: c45624b
-FAIL: c460010
FAIL: c4a013a
-FAIL: cd30001
+FAIL: c52010a
+FAIL: c52102a
+FAIL: c52102b
+FAIL: c52102c
+FAIL: c52102d
+FAIL: c52104c
+FAIL: c74209a
+FAIL: c954026
+FAIL: ca11021
+FAIL: cc70a01
+FAIL: cc70a02
FAIL: cd30002
FAIL: cd5011m
+FAIL: cxa4001
FAIL: cxa5a03
+FAIL: cxaca01
FAIL: cxg2002
FAIL: cxg2017
FAIL: cxg2020
=== acats Summary ===
-# of expected passes 2307
-# of unexpected failures 15
+# of expected passes 2296
+# of unexpected failures 24
Now the question is how to fix this for real.
Thanks alot.
Rainer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University