gcc archive
date index for October, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

October 31, 2005
23:52 Re: -Wuninitialized issues Daniel Jacobowitz
23:51 Re: -Wuninitialized issues Jeffrey A Law
23:35 Re: -Wuninitialized issues Jeffrey A Law
21:59 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Michael Veksler
21:41 A single SVK tarball is available Daniel Berlin
21:12 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Per Bothner
20:37 Re: new cctools, 590.12 for Darwin Andreas Tobler
20:19 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Joe Buck
20:14 Re: GPL question Gerald Pfeifer
19:35 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Per Bothner
18:53 Re: GPL question Florian Weimer
18:51 GPL question dfhgjwetgtry (sent by Nabble.c
18:48 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Florian Weimer
18:37 Re: [libgfortran] Patch to handle statically linked libgfortran Janis Johnson
18:33 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Joe Buck
18:33 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Joe Buck
18:02 Re: Bootstrapping of gcc-4.1 completly broken on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Andrew Pinski
17:56 Bootstrapping of gcc-4.1 completly broken on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Emrich
17:54 Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings FX Coudert
17:46 Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings FX Coudert
17:33 Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings Thomas Koenig
17:33 Re: Post-Mont-Tremblant mailing Janis Johnson
17:19 Re: .cvsignore still needed? Andreas Jaeger
17:17 Re: .cvsignore still needed? Tom Tromey
16:54 Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings Bernhard Fischer
16:37 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Joseph S. Myers
16:32 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Gerald Pfeifer
14:47 Re: .cvsignore still needed? Daniel Berlin
14:20 Re: The comment start symbol for arm assembler Paul Brook
14:19 Re: .cvsignore still needed? Andreas Jaeger
14:14 Re: picoChip port contribution Daniel Towner
13:49 Re: .cvsignore still needed? Daniel Berlin
12:21 Bug in install of gfortran for gcc-4.0.2 Rainer Emrich
12:20 Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings FX Coudert
09:23 new cctools, 590.12 for Darwin Geoffrey Keating
08:41 .cvsignore still needed? Andreas Jaeger
07:40 -Wuninitialized issues Mark Mitchell
07:32 Re: The comment start symbol for arm assembler Hanzac Chen
07:14 Analysis of optimization PRs Mark Mitchell
06:57 Regressions reviewed, main web page updated Mark Mitchell
06:55 The comment start symbol for arm assembler Hanzac Chen
06:10 Re: Use of Bugzilla fields Mark Mitchell
06:02 Re: Use of Bugzilla fields Ian Lance Taylor
02:37 Re: Tag reorg Gabriel Dos Reis
02:18 Re: Tag reorg Daniel Berlin
02:15 Re: Tag reorg Giovanni Bajo
02:08 Re: Tag reorg Gabriel Dos Reis
01:43 Re: Tag reorg Giovanni Bajo
01:23 Big thankyou Kean Johnston
01:11 Re: Tag reorg Joseph S. Myers
00:43 Re: Tag reorg Daniel Berlin
00:18 Re: Tag reorg Giovanni Bajo
00:07 Re: [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings Joseph S. Myers

October 30, 2005
23:51 [gfortran] gfortran options and cc1 warnings FX Coudert
23:43 Re: Properly setting the pkcconfig directory (was: Moving thepkgconfig directory from lib/ to libdata/?) Gerald Pfeifer
23:25 Re: Use of Bugzilla fields Daniel Berlin
22:48 Re: Use of Bugzilla fields Andrew Pinski
22:39 Re: Tag reorg Joseph S. Myers
22:20 Re: Tag reorg Mark Mitchell
22:16 Re: Tag reorg Mike Stump
22:08 Re: Use of Bugzilla fields Mark Mitchell
22:04 Re: Use of Bugzilla fields Andrew Pinski
22:01 Re: Use of Bugzilla fields Mark Mitchell
21:50 Re: Use of Bugzilla fields Joseph S. Myers
21:45 Re: Use of Bugzilla fields Daniel Berlin
21:42 Use of Bugzilla fields Mark Mitchell
19:34 Re: New SVN repo is up Mark Mitchell
19:25 Re: New SVN repo is up Mark Mitchell
18:51 Re: svn: Is it there yet? Giovanni Bajo
18:30 Re: Tag reorg Mark Mitchell
18:28 Re: Tag reorg Daniel Berlin
18:27 Re: Tag reorg Mike Stump
18:24 Re: Tag reorg Mark Mitchell
18:18 Re: svn: Is it there yet? Mike Stump
18:01 Re: svn: Is it there yet? Daniel Berlin
17:56 Re: svn: Is it there yet? Paul Thomas
16:40 Re: svn: Is it there yet? Mike Stump
16:29 Re: Broken versions Andrew Pinski
16:04 Re: Tag reorg Andreas Schwab
15:54 Can I easily export local gcc copy to a tar file ? Cauchy Song
15:20 Re: Tag reorg Diego Novillo
15:02 Re: Tag reorg Daniel Berlin
11:59 Re: Tag reorg Joseph S. Myers
11:25 [libgfortran] Patch to handle statically linked libgfortran FX Coudert
07:52 Re: GccPowerpc eabi HowTo - probem with stido functions ( sprintf) moshed (sent by Nabble.com)
07:48 Re: GccPowerpc eabi HowTo - probem with stido functions ( sprintf) moshed (sent by Nabble.com)
06:59 [gomp] libgomp/fortran.c:37: warning: implicit declaration of function 'malloc' Christian Joensson
05:39 Re: svn: Is it there yet? Paul Thomas
05:09 Re: svn: Is it there yet? Ian Lance Taylor
05:07 Re: Tag reorg Ian Lance Taylor
04:19 svn: Is it there yet? Paul Thomas
03:15 Re: svn troubles Ralf Corsepius
02:54 Tag reorg Daniel Berlin
00:46 Re: Broken versions shreyas krishnan
00:41 Re: gcc-4.1-20051029 is now available Daniel Berlin
00:39 Re: How do we retrieve wwwdocs from SVN ? Daniel Berlin

October 29, 2005
19:10 Re: Broken versions Andrew Pinski
18:54 Broken versions shreyas krishnan
18:02 Re: How do we retrieve wwwdocs from SVN ? Andrew Pinski
17:58 How do we retrieve wwwdocs from SVN ? Toon Moene
17:54 gcc-4.1-20051029 is now available gccadmin
16:59 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Eric Botcazou
16:46 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Canadian Cross Compile DJ Delorie
16:30 Re: Revisiting generalized lvalues Michael Krasnik
16:30 Re: Revisiting generalized lvalues Michael Krasnik
16:27 Re: Copies of the GCC repository Kevin Puetz
15:59 GCC 4.0.2 Canadian Cross Compile Mark Fortescue
15:30 Re: Revisiting generalized lvalues Florian Weimer
15:28 Re: Revisiting generalized lvalues Andrew Pinski
15:21 Revisiting generalized lvalues Michael Krasnik
14:26 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
11:12 Post-Mont-Tremblant mailing Joseph S. Myers
10:45 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Per Bothner
10:26 Re: backslash whitespace newline Per Bothner
03:31 Re: [Steven Woody] M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible? DJ Delorie
03:23 Re: [Steven Woody] M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible? Steven Woody
01:11 Re: SSH connection caching Vincent Lefevre

October 28, 2005
22:00 Re: Copies of the GCC repository Daniel Berlin
21:40 Re: Copies of the GCC repository Paul Brook
20:33 Re: How to know which front end? Tom Tromey
19:56 Re: What is gnattools? Steve Kargl
19:31 Re: Copies of the GCC repository Daniel Berlin
19:30 Re: How to know which front end? David Daney
19:29 Copies of the GCC repository Daniel Berlin
19:16 Re: non mainstream hardware. Jim Wilson
18:26 Re: Svn doc edit for 4.0 branch name Daniel Berlin
18:21 What is gnattools? Steve Kargl
17:48 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Mark Mitchell
17:35 non mainstream hardware. Brian Makin
17:35 Re: New SVN repo is up Joseph S. Myers
17:29 RE: New SVN repo is up Daniel Berlin
17:25 Re: New SVN repo is up Daniel Berlin
17:25 RE: New SVN repo is up Dave Korn
17:23 Re: New SVN repo is up Daniel Berlin
17:22 Re: New SVN repo is up Andreas Schwab
17:08 Re: Special bugzilla query for fixed PRs Albert Chin
17:01 Re: [Fwd: GCC 4.0 bug] Andrew Pinski
16:59 [Fwd: GCC 4.0 bug] Patrick Bennett
16:56 Re: Svn doc edit for 4.0 branch name Giovanni Bajo
16:54 Re: Special bugzilla query for fixed PRs Andrew Pinski
16:52 Special bugzilla query for fixed PRs Albert Chin
16:46 Re: New SVN repo is up Mike Stump
16:40 Svn doc edit for 4.0 branch name Mike Stump
16:37 Re: New SVN repo is up DJ Delorie
16:21 RE: New SVN repo is up Dave Korn
16:19 Re: How to know which front end? Joe Buck
16:07 Re: New SVN Wiki page Christopher Faylor
16:07 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Mark Mitchell
16:02 Re: New SVN Wiki page Gerald Pfeifer
16:00 Re: New SVN Wiki page Christopher Faylor
15:46 Re: [Steven Woody] M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible? DJ Delorie
15:44 How to know which front end? David Daney
15:32 Re: [Steven Woody] M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible? Steven Woody
15:02 New SVN repo is up Daniel Berlin
14:41 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Mike Stump
14:30 RE: anonymous svn over http? Calahan Josh A Ctr AEDC/ATA
14:21 RE: REMINDER: CVS Server going readonly tomorrow Dave Korn
13:18 RE: REMINDER: CVS Server going readonly tomorrow Daniel Berlin
13:14 RE: REMINDER: CVS Server going readonly tomorrow Dave Korn
13:12 RE: SSH connection caching Dave Korn
12:49 Re: quick way to transition a cvs checkout to svn? Daniel Berlin
12:48 RE: SSH connection caching Richard Kenner
12:22 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Alexandre Oliva
10:31 Re: quick way to transition a cvs checkout to svn? Giovanni Bajo
10:09 RE: SSH connection caching Dave Korn
10:02 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Robert Dewar
08:15 quick way to transition a cvs checkout to svn? Paolo Bonzini
07:36 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Eric Botcazou
07:14 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Mark Mitchell
07:12 GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-10-27) Mark Mitchell
07:11 Re: question on checkout? Tobias Schlüter
06:58 Re: svn troubles Ralf Corsepius
06:50 Re: svn troubles Andreas Jaeger
06:48 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Eric Botcazou
06:46 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Mark Mitchell
06:35 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Mark Mitchell
06:32 svn troubles Ralf Corsepius
06:18 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Eric Botcazou
03:12 Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64 Geert Bosch
02:51 Re: Aliases crossing procedures Diego Novillo
00:42 Re: Properly setting the pkcconfig directory (was: Moving the pkgconfig directory from lib/ to libdata/?) Tom Tromey

October 27, 2005
23:30 Re: New SVN Wiki page Giovanni Bajo
23:17 Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64 Geert Bosch
23:16 Re: question on checkout? Giovanni Bajo
23:15 SSH connection caching Richard Kenner
23:04 Re: anonymous svn over http? Daniel Berlin
22:56 Re: Problem building *-rtems on the head Andrew Pinski
22:51 Problem building *-rtems on the head Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
22:49 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
22:48 SVN: question on checkout? Tobias Schlüter
22:37 Aliases crossing procedures shreyas krishnan
22:15 SVN: question on checkout? Gerald Pfeifer
22:08 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Richard Henderson
22:04 anonymous svn over http? Joe Buck
21:36 Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64 Eric Botcazou
21:35 couldn't wait with that till 1st of April... Tommy Vercetti
21:26 Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64 Steve Ellcey
21:19 Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64 Andreas Schwab
21:07 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Eric Botcazou
20:53 Re: What is really a new line in most compilers Mike Stump
20:53 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Joe Buck
20:48 Re: Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Richard Henderson
20:31 Re: Error in "SSH connection caching" entry Paul Brook
20:18 Error in "SSH connection caching" entry Richard Kenner
20:18 Exception propagation problem on IA-64/Linux Eric Botcazou
20:05 Re: GccPowerpc eabi HowTo - probem with stido functions ( sprintf) Jim Wilson
19:23 Re: backslash whitespace newline Kean Johnston
19:18 Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64 Eric Botcazou
19:13 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined. Toon Moene
19:06 Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64 Geert Bosch
18:49 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Eric Christopher
18:35 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Andrew Pinski
18:33 resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal Joe Buck
18:25 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined. Toon Moene
18:09 Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64 Eric Botcazou
17:52 Re: Excess precision problem on IA-64 Andrew Pinski
17:38 Excess precision problem on IA-64 Eric Botcazou
17:22 Re: [Steven Woody] M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible? DJ Delorie
17:11 Re: [Steven Woody] M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible? Steven Woody
16:52 Re: backslash whitespace newline Stan Shebs
16:12 GccPowerpc eabi HowTo - probem with stido functions ( sprintf) moshed (sent by Nabble.com)
15:59 Re: backslash whitespace newline Alexandre Oliva
15:09 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
15:08 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
14:57 Re: backslash whitespace newline DJ Delorie
14:39 Re: backslash whitespace newline Richard Kenner
14:34 Re: backslash whitespace newline Scott Robert Ladd
14:12 Re: dw_at_high_pc = 0 Daniel Berlin
14:09 dw_at_high_pc = 0 Ladislav Lestan
13:45 Re: backslash whitespace newline Daniel Berlin
13:39 Re: backslash whitespace newline Richard Kenner
13:32 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
13:30 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
13:18 Re: backslash whitespace newline Scott Robert Ladd
13:14 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
12:59 Backlash newline newline backlash whiskey tango foxtrot Daniel Berlin
12:58 Re: backslash whitespace newline Olly Betts
10:39 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
09:33 Re: backslash whitespace newline Bernd Jendrissek
09:05 Re: backslash whitespace newline Bernd Jendrissek
07:53 Emit insns in the preparation statements of define_expand Eric Fisher
07:41 Emit insns in the preparation statements of define_expand Eric Fisher
07:06 Re: What is really a new line in most compilers Paolo Bonzini
01:21 re: M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible? Dan Kegel
00:58 Re: backslash whitespace newline Eric Christopher
00:57 Re: [Steven Woody] M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible? DJ Delorie
00:55 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
00:25 [Steven Woody] M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible? Steven Woody

October 26, 2005
23:59 Re: backslash whitespace newline Howard Hinnant
23:57 Re: backslash whitespace newline Vincent Lefevre
23:49 Re: backslash whitespace newline Vincent Lefevre
23:22 Re: semantics of null lang_hooks.callgraph.expand_function? Neil Booth
23:02 Re: semantics of null lang_hooks.callgraph.expand_function? Jim Wilson
22:54 Re: semantics of null lang_hooks.callgraph.expand_function? Jim Wilson
22:50 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
22:47 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
22:43 Re: backslash whitespace newline Eric Christopher
22:27 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
22:25 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
21:33 Re: What is really a new line in most compilers Howard Hinnant
21:18 Re: What is really a new line in most compilers DJ Delorie
21:12 Re: What is really a new line in most compilers Howard Hinnant
20:59 Re: What is really a new line in most compilers DJ Delorie
20:09 What is really a new line in most compilers Andrew Pinski
19:59 Re: Inserting statements in tree-ssa form Diego Novillo
19:49 Re: HowTo Cross Compile GCC on x86 Host for PowerPC Target Andreas Schwab
19:25 Re: backslash whitespace newline Stan Shebs
19:19 Re: backslash whitespace newline Howard Hinnant
19:19 RE: HowTo Cross Compile GCC on x86 Host for PowerPC Target Jeff Stevens
19:17 notes, presentations from GCC Improvement for Itanium sessions at Gelato meeting, Oct 3-4, 2005 Mark K. Smith
19:09 Re: HowTo Cross Compile GCC on x86 Host for PowerPC Target Richard Guenther
19:04 RE: HowTo Cross Compile GCC on x86 Host for PowerPC Target Dave Korn
19:00 RE: HowTo Cross Compile GCC on x86 Host for PowerPC Target Dave Korn
18:53 RE: backslash whitespace newline Dave Korn
18:53 Re: backslash whitespace newline Eric Christopher
18:49 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
18:47 HowTo Cross Compile GCC on x86 Host for PowerPC Target Jeff Stevens
18:34 Inserting statements in tree-ssa form Mihai Burcea
18:23 Re: Out of curiosity: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:57 Re: Out of curiosity: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org? Daniel Berlin
17:40 Re: Out of curiosity: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org? Paolo Carlini
17:36 Re: backslash whitespace newline Scott Robert Ladd
17:34 Re: Out of curiosity: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org? DJ Delorie
17:24 Re: backslash whitespace newline Steven Bosscher
17:22 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
17:19 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
17:17 Re: backslash whitespace newline Kean Johnston
17:17 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
17:16 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
17:16 Re: backslash whitespace newline Dale Johannesen
17:04 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
16:59 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
16:58 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
16:55 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
16:46 Re: Out of curiosity: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org? Giovanni Bajo
16:45 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
16:39 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
16:38 Re: backslash whitespace newline Steven Bosscher
16:35 Re: backslash whitespace newline Howard Hinnant
16:30 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
16:28 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
16:18 Re: backslash whitespace newline Robert Dewar
16:17 Out of curiosity: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org? Paolo Carlini
16:11 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
16:03 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
13:46 Re: A question about define_insn and force-reg Paolo Bonzini
12:39 Re: backslash whitespace newline Paul Brook
12:24 Re: In the meanwhile, 1.3.0rc1 of SVN will become available .. Daniel Berlin
11:38 In the meanwhile, 1.3.0rc1 of SVN will become available .. Toon Moene
11:27 Re: glibc compilation error Paolo Carlini
11:24 glibc compilation error Jeff Stevens
11:03 Build report for AIX 5.1 Mario Linke
11:00 Successful gcc 4.0.2 build (C,C++ on MinGW i386 WinXP) dengxy
11:00 Re: ISO/IEC 14882:2003 Giovanni Bajo
10:29 Re: semantics of null lang_hooks.callgraph.expand_function? Dueway Qi
09:23 Re: backslash whitespace newline Kean Johnston
08:21 A question about define_insn and force-reg Eric Fisher
06:16 Re: backslash whitespace newline Steven Bosscher
06:06 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
05:45 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
05:36 semantics of null lang_hooks.callgraph.expand_function? Gary Funck
04:48 Re: GGC Questions Ranjit Mathew
04:46 Re: backslash whitespace newline Shantonu Sen
04:33 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
04:28 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
04:25 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
02:48 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
02:26 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
02:18 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
02:10 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
02:07 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
01:51 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
01:50 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
01:49 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
01:46 Re: backslash whitespace newline David Daney
01:46 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
01:46 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
01:45 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
01:42 REMINDER: CVS Server going readonly tomorrow Daniel Berlin
01:39 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
01:38 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
01:34 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
00:53 Re: backslash whitespace newline Vincent Lefevre
00:41 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
00:34 Re: backslash whitespace newline Howard Hinnant
00:30 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
00:22 Re: backslash whitespace newline Howard Hinnant
00:22 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
00:13 Re: backslash whitespace newline Howard Hinnant
00:11 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck

October 25, 2005
23:53 Re: backslash whitespace newline Gabriel Dos Reis
23:48 Re: backslash whitespace newline Ian Lance Taylor
23:44 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
23:41 Re: backslash whitespace newline Howard Hinnant
23:25 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
23:07 Re: backslash whitespace newline Stan Shebs
22:53 Re: backslash whitespace newline Eric Christopher
22:52 ISO/IEC 14882:2003 Turner, Keith S
22:52 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
22:51 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
22:47 gcc-3.4-20051025 is now available gccadmin
22:47 Re: backslash whitespace newline Eric Christopher
22:46 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
22:42 Re: backslash whitespace newline Phil Edwards
22:35 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
22:35 Re: backslash whitespace newline Eric Christopher
22:30 Re: GCC-generated code and i386 condition codes behavior Richard Henderson
22:28 Re: c compiler VMS 8.2 Robert Dewar
22:28 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
22:27 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code Richard Henderson
22:27 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code Richard Henderson
22:24 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
22:22 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andrew Pinski
22:15 Re: backslash whitespace newline Eric Christopher
21:28 Re: backslash whitespace newline Daniel Jacobowitz
21:16 Re: backslash whitespace newline Vincent Lefevre
21:10 Re: c compiler VMS 8.2 Mike Stump
21:07 Re: GGC Questions Mike Stump
21:00 Re: [gomp] C++ #pragma omp for and -fno-for-scope Richard Henderson
20:56 Re: backslash whitespace newline Vincent Lefevre
20:54 Re: backslash whitespace newline Andreas Schwab
20:50 Re: SVN 1.3? Giovanni Bajo
20:49 Re: SVN 1.3? Daniel Berlin
20:44 Re: backslash whitespace newline Florian Weimer
20:35 SVN 1.3? Richard Kenner
20:31 Re: c compiler VMS 8.2 Steven Bosscher
20:22 Re: New SVN Wiki page Mike Stump
20:20 c compiler VMS 8.2 rudy dot campe at annabeltexti
20:01 Re: backslash whitespace newline Daniel Jacobowitz
19:57 Re: backslash whitespace newline Tom Tromey
19:53 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
19:51 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code Daniel Jacobowitz
19:44 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code James E Wilson
19:30 Re: [gomp] C++ #pragma omp for and -fno-for-scope Mike Stump
19:26 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code James E Wilson
19:24 Re: Problem building svn on x86-64 Alexandre Oliva
19:12 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
19:12 Re: Problem building svn on x86-64 H. J. Lu
19:06 Re: Problem building svn on x86-64 Richard Kenner
19:05 Re: Problem building svn on x86-64 H. J. Lu
18:56 [gomp] C++ #pragma omp for and -fno-for-scope Jakub Jelinek
18:34 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code Joern RENNECKE
17:43 Re: Question on proposed use of "svn switch" Daniel Jacobowitz
17:39 Problem building svn on x86-64 Richard Kenner
17:13 Re: Question on proposed use of "svn switch" Florian Weimer
17:12 Re: Question on proposed use of "svn switch" Richard Kenner
17:06 Re: Question on proposed use of "svn switch" Daniel Jacobowitz
17:01 Question on proposed use of "svn switch" Richard Kenner
15:54 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
13:51 Re: GGC Questions Andrew MacLeod
13:36 Re: GGC Questions Daniel Berlin
13:36 RE: backslash whitespace newline Dave Korn
12:53 Re: backslash whitespace newline 'Neil Booth'
10:26 RE: A question about define_insn and force-reg Dave Korn
10:18 RE: backslash whitespace newline Dave Korn
08:56 Re: A question about define_insn and force-reg Paolo Bonzini
08:33 Re: backslash whitespace newline Vincent Lefevre
08:14 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code Christophe LYON
08:10 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code Christophe LYON
08:00 A question about define_insn and force-reg Eric Fisher
07:50 Re: New SVN Wiki page Giovanni Bajo
05:41 Re: backslash whitespace newline Florian Weimer
05:13 GCC 4.0.2 i686-pc-linux-gnu Debian testing/unstable Dominic Crutchley
04:43 Re: GGC Questions Ranjit Mathew
02:07 Re: backslash whitespace newline DJ Delorie
01:59 Re: backslash whitespace newline Mike Stump
01:02 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
00:52 Re: backslash whitespace newline Vincent Lefevre
00:46 Passing an argument shreyas krishnan
00:01 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code Jim Wilson

October 24, 2005
23:42 Re: docs for setting up new target library Ian Lance Taylor
22:57 Re: backslash whitespace newline Joe Buck
22:52 Re: backslash whitespace newline Neil Booth
22:45 backslash whitespace newline Howard Hinnant
21:48 docs for setting up new target library Janis Johnson
20:39 GCC-generated code and i386 condition codes behavior Bryan Ford
20:24 Re: Profiling+nested functions+dynamic linking on IA-64/Linux Eric Botcazou
20:16 Re: New SVN Wiki page Paolo Carlini
20:14 New SVN Wiki page Giovanni Bajo
19:51 Re: GGC Questions Mike Stump
19:23 Re: Diego Novillo and Daniel Berlin appointed alias analysis maintainers Diego Novillo
19:11 Re: adding a new register type to i386.h, and add spill/fill support Ian Lance Taylor
18:24 Re: Profiling+nested functions+dynamic linking on IA-64/Linux Richard Henderson
17:27 Re: Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code Daniel Jacobowitz
16:31 Question on Dwarf2 unwind info and optimized code Christophe LYON
16:16 GGC Questions Ranjit Mathew
15:53 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gerald Pfeifer
15:41 Diego Novillo and Daniel Berlin appointed alias analysis maintainers David Edelsohn
15:34 Profiling+nested functions+dynamic linking on IA-64/Linux Eric Botcazou
13:31 Re: adding a new register type to i386.h, and add spill/fill support Tyler Anderson
13:03 Re: @true in makefiles Rafael Espíndola
13:01 Re: A question on alias analysis Daniel Berlin
09:29 Re: A question on alias analysis Nathan Sidwell
05:07 Re: A question about RTL output Ian Lance Taylor
05:02 Re: adding a new register type to i386.h, and add spill/fill support Ian Lance Taylor
04:59 Re: @true in makefiles Ian Lance Taylor
04:52 A question about RTL output Eric Fisher
04:50 A question on alias analysis shreyas krishnan
04:41 Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c Ian Lance Taylor
04:35 Re: A question about RTL output Ian Lance Taylor
01:23 adding a new register type to i386.h, and add spill/fill support Tyler Anderson
01:13 Re: MIPS TLS relocation assembly code invalid from GCC-4.1... Steven J. Hill
01:01 A question about RTL output Eric Fisher

October 23, 2005
22:17 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion kfogel
22:07 Re: MIPS TLS relocation assembly code invalid from GCC-4.1... Jim Wilson
21:46 Re: A question about RTL output Jim Wilson
20:17 @true in makefiles Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
19:37 Re: [GCC] - new mirror site Gerald Pfeifer
19:25 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM NN. Toon Moene
17:40 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined. Paul Brook
17:10 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined. Toon Moene
10:59 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined. Dorit Naishlos
09:41 Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c Eric Botcazou
09:37 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Florian Weimer
08:49 Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c Razya Ladelsky
08:45 [Fwd: Re: Problem with GNAT Ada floating-point image representationunder HPUX] .:SB:.
07:45 A question about RTL output Eric Fisher

October 22, 2005
20:05 Re: svn tag inspection Branko Äibej
19:40 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM NN. FX Coudert
19:36 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM NN. Steven Bosscher
19:34 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM NN. Steven Bosscher
19:05 MIPS TLS relocation assembly code invalid from GCC-4.1... Steven J. Hill
18:04 Offline Andrew Pinski
17:51 gcc-4.1-20051022 is now available gccadmin
11:28 Re: svn tag inspection Giovanni Bajo
10:34 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 6: Honoring Fortran's Alias Requirements - might be a bug. Toon Moene
10:19 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined. Toon Moene
10:12 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 1: This dependence is determinable. Toon Moene
09:51 Vectorizing HIRLAM II: Using the autovect branch compiler. Toon Moene
07:27 Re: svn tag inspection Jeffrey A Law
06:01 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Paul Thomas
03:41 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Feng Wang
02:06 Re: svn tag inspection Mike Stump
01:25 Re: svn tag inspection Giovanni Bajo
01:00 So here is the final subversion plan Daniel Berlin
00:38 Re: svn tag inspection Daniel Berlin

October 21, 2005
23:20 Re: regression hunt setup using Subversion Mike Stump
23:11 Re: regression hunt setup using Subversion Andreas Schwab
22:38 svn tag inspection Mike Stump
21:26 Re: stack memory Mike Stump
21:11 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Andrew Pinski
21:05 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Paul Thomas
21:04 RE: [gelato-gcc] 15 Sept notes from GCC improvement for Itaniumconference call - Final Version Andrew E. Schuh
20:28 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Ben Collins-Sussman
19:51 Re: regression hunt setup using Subversion Shantonu Sen
19:49 Vectorizing HIRLAM NN. Toon Moene
19:47 Re: Grabbing Gomp (was: Is gcc optimized for thread level parallelism?) Ian Lance Taylor
19:27 Re: regression hunt setup using Subversion Janis Johnson
19:16 Re: regression hunt setup using Subversion Andrew Pinski
19:11 Re: regression hunt setup using Subversion Joseph S. Myers
17:49 regression hunt setup using Subversion Janis Johnson
16:52 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
16:51 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Andreas Schwab
16:28 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
16:27 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
16:24 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Andreas Schwab
16:23 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Andreas Schwab
16:08 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
16:05 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
16:02 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Andreas Schwab
16:00 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
16:00 Successful gcc-4.0.2 build (MinGW i386 on WinXP) dengxy
15:56 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 3: Can't vectorize DOUBLE COMPLEX loops ... Dorit Naishlos
15:53 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 5: Another one out of the "unhandled data-ref" grabbag. Dorit Naishlos
15:53 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined. Dorit Naishlos
15:53 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 2: One out of the "unhandled data-ref" garbage bin :-) Dorit Naishlos
15:52 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 2: One out of the "unhandled data-ref" garbage bin :-) Dorit Naishlos
15:52 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 1: This dependence is determinable. Dorit Naishlos
15:38 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
15:20 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Giovanni Bajo
15:13 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paul Brook
15:12 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
15:05 stack memory Ivan Novick
15:05 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Giovanni Bajo
15:04 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Richard Guenther
15:03 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paul Brook
15:02 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
14:59 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
14:57 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paul Brook
14:37 RE: How do I disable classes of test? Dave Korn
14:29 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
14:22 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 6: Honoring Fortran's Alias Requirements - might be a bug. Diego Novillo
14:17 Subversion access via http proxy Andrew STUBBS
13:52 Grabbing Gomp (was: Is gcc optimized for thread level parallelism?) Scott Robert Ladd
13:51 Vectorizing HIRLAM 6: Honoring Fortran's Alias Requirements - might be a bug. Toon Moene
13:51 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
13:40 Vectorizing HIRLAM 5: Another one out of the "unhandled data-ref" grab bag. Toon Moene
13:34 Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined. Toon Moene
13:25 Vectorizing HIRLAM 3: Can't vectorize DOUBLE COMPLEX loops ... Toon Moene
13:25 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 2: One out of the "unhandled data-ref" garbage bin :-) Andrew Pinski
13:20 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 1: This dependence is determinable. Steven Bosscher
13:20 Vectorizing HIRLAM 2: One out of the "unhandled data-ref" garbage bin :-) Toon Moene
13:19 Re: Marking conditional blocks Steven Bosscher
13:12 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
13:12 Vectorizing HIRLAM 1: This dependence is determinable. Toon Moene
13:02 Vector et emergo: On the vectorization of the HIRLAM Weather Prediction code. Toon Moene
12:57 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Andreas Schwab
12:55 Marking conditional blocks shreyas krishnan
12:48 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Daniel Berlin
12:45 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
12:01 Re: Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
11:56 Re: A couple more subversion notes Joseph S. Myers
11:55 Is the test svn repository working fine? Paolo Carlini
11:03 Re: A couple more subversion notes Nix
09:34 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paolo Bonzini
09:33 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andrew Haley
09:07 Re: A couple more subversion notes Vincent Lefevre
08:49 Re: Compilation of Ada under FreeBSD Frédéric PRACA
08:14 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Tobias Schlüter
07:31 Re: A couple more subversion notes Lars Gullik Bjønnes
05:48 make bootstrap results: GCC 4.0.2, i686-pc-cygwin Thomas I. Burbage
04:56 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Paul Thomas
04:15 Re: A couple more subversion notes Vincent Lefevre
04:09 Re: A couple more subversion notes Vincent Lefevre
03:28 Re: A couple more subversion notes Vincent Lefevre
03:11 Re: peep2_next_insn returns PEEP2_EOB Kaz Kojima
02:25 Re: Is gcc optimized for thread level parallelism? Diego Novillo
02:00 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
01:37 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Daniel Berlin
01:08 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
00:52 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Steve Kargl
00:21 Re: A couple more subversion notes Lars Gullik Bjønnes
00:07 Re: A couple more subversion notes Bernd Schmidt

October 20, 2005
23:52 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andreas Schwab
23:45 Re: A couple more subversion notes Lars Gullik Bjønnes
23:43 Re: A couple more subversion notes Janis Johnson
23:34 Re: A couple more subversion notes Lars Gullik Bjønnes
23:23 Re: Deinitialization of globals Jim Wilson
23:13 Re: Is gcc optimized for thread level parallelism? Jim Wilson
22:46 gcc-4.0-20051020 is now available gccadmin
22:11 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
22:02 Re: A couple more subversion notes Ian Lance Taylor
21:36 Problem with GNAT Ada floating-point image representation under HPUX Clarke, Carus V
21:26 Re: A couple more subversion notes Mike Stump
21:12 Re: A couple more subversion notes Kevin Handy
20:50 Re: [BENCHMARK] runtime impact of fix for target/17390 on i386 targets Uros Bizjak
18:54 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53 Re: Question WRT liveness of svn repository... Bobby McN
18:36 Re: CVS access to the uberbaum tree Christopher Faylor
18:35 Re: Whoops - Working copy size in subversion Mike Stump
18:15 Re: Question WRT liveness of svn repository... Daniel Berlin
18:13 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Daniel Berlin
18:06 Question WRT liveness of svn repository... David Daney
18:04 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
17:58 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paul Brook
17:47 Re: A couple more subversion notes Mark Mitchell
17:45 Whoops - Working copy size in subversion Daniel Berlin
17:31 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
17:30 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
17:29 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
17:21 Re: A couple more subversion notes Joe Buck
17:16 Re: A couple more subversion notes Joe Buck
17:09 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
17:08 Re: A couple more subversion notes Joe Buck
17:07 Re: peep2_next_insn returns PEEP2_EOB Richard Henderson
17:04 Re: A couple more subversion notes Joe Buck
16:46 Re: A couple more subversion notes Alexandre Oliva
16:44 Re: A couple more subversion notes Joe Buck
16:43 Re: [BENCHMARK] runtime impact of fix for target/17390 on i386 targets Ian Lance Taylor
16:41 Re: Compilation of Ada under FreeBSD Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
16:40 Re: Compilation of Ada under FreeBSD Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
16:36 Re: A couple more subversion notes Marcin Dalecki
16:36 Re: A couple more subversion notes Steven Bosscher
16:34 Re: A couple more subversion notes Alexandre Oliva
16:34 Re: A couple more subversion notes Steven Bosscher
16:21 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
16:20 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
16:16 Re: A couple more subversion notes Ian Lance Taylor
16:08 Re: using multiple trees with subversion chris jefferson
15:56 Compilation of Ada under FreeBSD Frédéric PRACA
15:25 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
15:13 Re: A couple more subversion notes Tobias . Schlueter
15:08 Re: [BENCHMARK] runtime impact of fix for target/17390 on i386 targets Uros Bizjak
15:04 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andrew Haley
14:59 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
14:55 peep2_next_insn returns PEEP2_EOB Kaz Kojima
14:53 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
14:48 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
14:47 Re: A couple more subversion notes Mark Mitchell
14:41 Re: A couple more subversion notes Bobby McN
14:25 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Steve Kargl
13:55 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
13:46 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
13:40 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
13:37 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
13:33 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Jacobowitz
13:28 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Florian Weimer
13:24 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
13:12 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
12:58 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
12:52 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paolo Bonzini
12:42 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
12:10 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
12:10 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
11:33 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Guenther
11:31 Re: A couple more subversion notes Ranjit Mathew
11:25 Re: A couple more subversion notes François-Xavier Coudert
11:24 Re: A couple more subversion notes Ranjit Mathew
10:49 Re: A couple more subversion notes Steven Bosscher
10:46 Re: A couple more subversion notes Marcin Dalecki
10:31 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Guenther
10:23 Re: [gomp] Does it make sense to post bug reports already? Richard Henderson
10:12 Re: A couple more subversion notes Arnaud Charlet
10:06 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
09:59 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andrew Haley
09:51 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
09:46 Re: A couple more subversion notes Arnaud Charlet
09:37 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
09:28 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Guenther
09:08 Re: A couple more subversion notes Steven Bosscher
09:06 Re: A couple more subversion notes Joseph S. Myers
09:03 Re: [BENCHMARK] runtime impact of fix for target/17390 on i386 targets Steven Bosscher
09:03 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Earnshaw
09:01 Re: A couple more subversion notes Eric Botcazou
08:59 Re: A couple more subversion notes Eric Botcazou
08:59 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paolo Carlini
08:59 Re: A couple more subversion notes Arnaud Charlet
08:53 Re: A couple more subversion notes Ranjit Mathew
08:46 [BENCHMARK] runtime impact of fix for target/17390 on i386 targets Uros Bizjak
07:56 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Guenther
07:53 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paolo Bonzini
07:17 [gomp] Does it make sense to post bug reports already? Volker Reichelt
07:10 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
06:59 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
06:51 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
06:35 Re: A couple more subversion notes Gabriel Dos Reis
02:53 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Daniel Berlin
02:43 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Kean Johnston
01:53 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Daniel Berlin
00:09 Re: A couple more subversion notes Devang Patel

October 19, 2005
23:55 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Kean Johnston
23:36 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Joe Buck
22:40 Re: Is gcc optimized for thread level parallelism? Joe Buck
22:35 Is gcc optimized for thread level parallelism? x z
22:27 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Steve Kargl
21:07 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Thomas Koenig
21:06 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Andrew Pinski
21:05 Re: A couple more subversion notes Bernd Schmidt
21:04 Re: Making a new cross-compile target: where to begin? software dot au at gmail dot c
20:59 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Paul Thomas
20:56 Re: Making a new cross-compile target: where to begin? DJ Delorie
20:49 Re: Making a new cross-compile target: where to begin? software dot au at gmail dot c
20:37 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion FX Coudert
20:25 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Richard Guenther
20:19 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
20:12 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Steve Kargl
20:06 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Richard Guenther
19:44 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Kenner
19:36 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Daniel Berlin
19:32 Re: A couple more subversion notes Joe Buck
19:23 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Tobias Schlüter
19:20 Re: A couple more subversion notes Mark Mitchell
19:16 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Steve Kargl
18:59 Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion Tobias Schlüter
18:46 Re: A couple more subversion notes Diego Novillo
18:42 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andrew Haley
18:42 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paolo Carlini
18:36 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
18:17 The move to subversion Loren James Rittle
18:00 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Mike Stump
16:40 Re: Making a new cross-compile target: where to begin? Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault
16:04 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andreas Schwab
15:57 Making a new cross-compile target: where to begin? software dot au at gmail dot c
15:49 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Jacobowitz
15:45 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
15:39 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paolo Carlini
15:39 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
15:35 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
15:32 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
15:26 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andreas Schwab
15:22 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
15:21 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
15:20 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Jacobowitz
15:19 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Jacobowitz
15:19 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andrew Haley
15:19 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
15:18 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Guenther
15:18 Re: A couple more subversion notes Arnaud Charlet
15:16 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Jacobowitz
15:15 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Jacobowitz
15:13 Re: A couple more subversion notes Arnaud Charlet
15:12 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
15:12 Re: A couple more subversion notes Steven Bosscher
15:10 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
15:05 Re: A couple more subversion notes Giovanni Bajo
15:05 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paolo Carlini
15:03 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andreas Schwab
15:02 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
15:01 Re: A couple more subversion notes Andrew Haley
14:59 Re: A couple more subversion notes Arnaud Charlet
14:57 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Vincent Lefevre
14:55 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paolo Carlini
14:52 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Guenther
14:51 Re: A couple more subversion notes Arnaud Charlet
14:45 Re: A couple more subversion notes Arnaud Charlet
14:23 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
14:17 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
14:16 Re: A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
14:05 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Ranjit Mathew
14:04 Re: A couple more subversion notes Richard Guenther
13:56 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Paolo Bonzini
13:54 Re: A couple more subversion notes Paolo Bonzini
13:42 A couple more subversion notes Daniel Berlin
13:23 Deinitialization of globals Piotr Wyderski
12:49 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Daniel Berlin
12:14 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Daniel Berlin
12:07 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Daniel Berlin
11:48 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Giovanni Bajo
09:56 Re: using multiple trees with subversion François-Xavier Coudert
09:50 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Giovanni Bajo
09:41 Re: using multiple trees with subversion Florian Weimer
08:19 using multiple trees with subversion François-Xavier Coudert

October 18, 2005
23:03 Re: Subversion and firewalls question Daniel Berlin
22:57 Re: Subversion and firewalls question Steve Ellcey
22:49 Re: Subversion and firewalls question Paul Brook
22:47 gcc-3.4-20051018 is now available gccadmin
22:43 Re: Subversion and firewalls question Daniel Berlin
22:34 Re: Subversion and firewalls question Ian Lance Taylor
22:31 Subversion and firewalls question Steve Ellcey
22:07 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Giovanni Bajo
21:21 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Kean Johnston
20:36 Re: Linking of object files from different compilers for ARM Paul Brook
19:58 Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions Paul Thomas
19:56 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Giovanni Bajo
19:56 Re: RFC: weakref GCC attribute and .weakref assembly directive Aaron W. LaFramboise
19:28 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Steve Kargl
19:26 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:12 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Andrew Pinski
19:08 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Steve Kargl
19:05 Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions Jakub Jelinek
18:57 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Daniel Berlin
18:22 Re: Question on i386 stack adjustment optimization H. J. Lu
18:18 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Steve Kargl
17:59 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Andrew Pinski
17:56 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Paul Brook
17:56 Re: Updating a subversion directory? Daniel Berlin
17:44 Updating a subversion directory? Steve Kargl
17:11 Re: Question on i386 stack adjustment optimization Jan Hubicka
16:20 Re: RFC: weakref GCC attribute and .weakref assembly directive Alexandre Oliva
08:47 Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions Richard Henderson
08:05 New GCC mirror Anton Titov
04:24 Re: contribution to gcc Ian Lance Taylor
04:08 Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions Steve Kargl
03:09 Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions Richard Henderson
01:26 contribution to gcc Ganesh Bikshandi
00:08 Re: Question on i386 stack adjustment optimization Ross Ridge

October 17, 2005
22:38 Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions Paul Thomas
22:15 Question on i386 stack adjustment optimization H. J. Lu
21:37 [gomp] objc/objc-act.c:1262: error: too few arguments to function 'finish_class_member_access_expr' Christian Joensson
20:26 Re: Moving to subversion? Steve Kargl
20:01 Re: Moving to subversion? Florian Weimer
19:44 Re: Moving to subversion? Daniel Berlin
19:43 Re: Moving to subversion? Steve Kargl
19:25 Re: Moving to subversion? Daniel Berlin
19:15 Moving to subversion? Steve Kargl
17:56 Re: CVS access to the uberbaum tree Jim Wilson
17:00 Re: [cft] aligning main's stack frame Richard Henderson
16:51 Re: Wformat-security and string literal Hagen Paul Pfeifer
16:28 Re: Wformat-security and string literal Joe Buck
15:30 Re: error: forward declaration of `struct bit::bitObject' Florian Weimer
15:01 Re: Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions Steve Kargl
10:25 Re: [cft] aligning main's stack frame Andi Kleen
10:15 Re: How do I disable classes of test? Daniel Towner
09:49 Wformat-security and string literal Hagen Paul Pfeifer
09:21 Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions Steven Bosscher
09:04 error: forward declaration of `struct bit::bitObject' Roel Bindels
07:12 UNDELIVERED (was Hi) Netflix
06:34 Minor Tree-SSA Documentation Oddities Ranjit Mathew
06:13 Re: Final Subversion testing this week Zack Weinberg
05:46 Re: [Fwd: ezmlm warning] Ian Lance Taylor
05:33 [Fwd: ezmlm warning] Paul Thomas

October 16, 2005
22:23 Re: Final Subversion testing this week Daniel Berlin
22:00 Re: Final Subversion testing this week Florian Weimer
21:32 Re: Final Subversion testing this week Ian Lance Taylor
21:29 Re: Final Subversion testing this week Daniel Berlin
20:59 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Daniel Berlin
20:40 Re: Final Subversion testing this week Daniel Berlin
20:33 Re: [cft] aligning main's stack frame Kean Johnston
20:19 Re: Final Subversion testing this week Andreas Schwab
20:11 Re: Final Subversion testing this week Daniel Berlin
20:11 [cft] aligning main's stack frame Richard Henderson
20:01 Re: Final Subversion testing this week Joseph S. Myers
19:52 CVS access to the uberbaum tree Peter Barada
19:35 Final Subversion testing this week Daniel Berlin
10:46 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Avi Kivity
10:36 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Kai Henningsen
03:43 Re: About the alignment of main Kean Johnston
01:34 About the alignment of main Kean Johnston

October 15, 2005
17:50 gcc-4.1-20051015 is now available gccadmin
17:32 DWARF 3 Public Review Michael Eager
17:23 [GCC] - new mirror site Frank Ned
14:39 Re: GCC optimization oddity Giovanni Bajo
13:01 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
00:46 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Robert Dewar

October 14, 2005
23:54 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Richard Henderson
23:36 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Kean Johnston
23:18 RE: bitmaps in gcc Meissner, Michael
22:58 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Richard Henderson
22:07 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Andrew Pinski
21:15 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Kean Johnston
21:05 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Jason Molenda
21:03 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Richard Henderson
20:48 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Daniel Jacobowitz
20:44 Re: bitmaps in gcc Richard Henderson
20:43 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Kean Johnston
20:13 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Andrew Pinski
19:55 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Andrew Pinski
19:44 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Kean Johnston
19:33 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Kean Johnston
19:33 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Andrew Pinski
19:19 Re: many libgcc in MacOS X 10.4 build Mike Stump
19:17 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Daniel Jacobowitz
19:14 Re: Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Andrew Pinski
19:11 Severe problems with vectorizing stuff in 4.0.3 HEAD Kean Johnston
18:40 Re: bitmaps in gcc Ian Lance Taylor
18:27 bitmaps in gcc Brian Makin
18:04 Re: Passing va_args... Kean Johnston
15:39 Re: Passing va_args... Andreas Schwab
15:36 Re: Passing va_args... Kalaky
15:26 Re: Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Emrich
15:25 Re: Linking of object files from different compilers for ARM Daniel Jacobowitz
15:19 Passing va_args... Kalaky
15:02 Re: Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Albert Chin
12:52 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Daniel Berlin
11:41 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Joseph S. Myers
08:18 [RFC] Flow: Handle CLOBBERs like SETs if the reg stays live Andreas Krebbel
06:49 Linking of object files from different compilers for ARM Yaroslav Karulin
05:15 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:59 Re: Duplicating immediate predecessor of EXIT_BLOCK Ian Lance Taylor
04:35 Re: Duplicating immediate predecessor of EXIT_BLOCK mcrosier
04:09 Re: Duplicating immediate predecessor of EXIT_BLOCK Ian Lance Taylor
03:22 many libgcc in MacOS X 10.4 build Jack Howarth
02:35 Re: [gfortran] Change language name from "f95" to "fortran" Jim Wilson
02:05 Duplicating immediate predecessor of EXIT_BLOCK mcrosier
01:03 Re: Need advice: x86 redudant compare to zero Richard Henderson
01:00 Re: Need advice: x86 redudant compare to zero Richard Kenner
00:23 Re: Need advice: x86 redudant compare to zero Dale Johannesen
00:11 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Joe Buck
00:10 Re: Need advice: x86 redudant compare to zero Andrew Pinski
00:03 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Gabriel Dos Reis
00:00 Re: Need advice: x86 redudant compare to zero Steven Bosscher
00:00 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Gabriel Dos Reis

October 13, 2005
23:58 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Gabriel Dos Reis
23:57 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Gabriel Dos Reis
23:53 Re: Need advice: x86 redudant compare to zero Steven Bosscher
23:41 Need advice: x86 redudant compare to zero Evan Cheng
22:56 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Daniel Berlin
22:53 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Mike Stump
22:46 gcc-4.0-20051013 is now available gccadmin
21:57 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Benjamin Kosnik
20:45 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Joe Buck
19:31 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Benjamin Kosnik
19:03 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Mike Stump
18:55 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Paolo Carlini
18:52 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Paolo Carlini
18:51 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Mike Stump
18:47 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Thomas Costa
18:43 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Mike Stump
18:33 GCC optimization oddity Prosun Niyogi
17:35 [RFC] Fortran ICE caused by array addressability issue Ulrich Weigand
17:28 Re: Linker error about relocation Ian Lance Taylor
17:10 Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu Rainer Emrich
15:59 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Joe Buck
15:57 [gomp] objcp/objcp-decl.c:93: error: too many arguments to function 'lookup_name' Christian Joensson
15:57 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Thomas Costa
14:41 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Benjamin Kosnik
13:41 Re: RFC: weakref GCC attribute and .weakref assembly directive Daniel Jacobowitz
13:33 Re: RFC: weakref GCC attribute and .weakref assembly directive Aaron W. LaFramboise
11:51 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Sebastian Pop
11:16 [RFC] Don't emit REG_DEAD for clobbers if reg stays live Andreas Krebbel
10:55 Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5? Rainer Emrich
09:45 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Nathan Sidwell
08:53 Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5? Rainer Orth
08:47 Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5? Rainer Orth
08:01 Linker error about relocation Eric Fisher
07:28 Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5? Laurent GUERBY
06:50 Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5? Richard Sandiford
02:47 Re: Some svn numbers Daniel Berlin
01:51 Re: Some svn numbers Daniel Berlin
01:37 Re: Some svn numbers Marcin Dalecki
01:25 Re: Some svn numbers Mike Stump
01:09 Re: rsync access seems to be broken Daniel Jacobowitz
01:07 Re: Some svn numbers Mike Stump
00:55 Re: Some svn numbers Marcin Dalecki
00:44 Re: Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Mike Stump
00:38 Re: rsync access seems to be broken Mike Stump

October 12, 2005
23:45 Re: adding a MIPS instruction with operands to GCC Eric Christopher
23:40 adding a MIPS instruction with operands to GCC guru venky
23:25 Re: Error at compiling linux-2.6.13.4 Jim Wilson
23:16 Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero? Steve Kargl
22:38 Ideas for compile-time checking of exception specifications. Kevin Regan
22:08 Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero? Richard Henderson
22:06 Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero? Joseph S. Myers
22:00 Re: GCC Installation Problem - Please help.... Jim Wilson
21:47 Re: cross build gcc 4.0/4.1 fail Jim Wilson
21:46 Re: A New Architecture Jim Wilson
21:42 Re: Basic block duplication mcrosier
21:37 Re: Explicit NOPs for a VLIW Machine Jim Wilson
21:20 Warning on C++ catch by value on non primitive types Thomas Costa
20:48 Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero? Steve Kargl
20:41 Re: Basic block duplication mcrosier
20:24 Re: complex arithmetic and signed zero? Richard Henderson
20:18 Re: Basic block duplication Richard Henderson
19:00 Re: rsync access seems to be broken Laurent GUERBY
18:59 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
18:04 Re: Whats the real penalty of non-mmap ggc? Kean Johnston
17:51 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Devang Patel
17:49 complex arithmetic and signed zero? Steve Kargl
17:46 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Geoffrey Keating
17:46 Re: Whats the real penalty of non-mmap ggc? Geoffrey Keating
17:19 Whats the real penalty of non-mmap ggc? Kean Johnston
15:42 Successful gcc4.0.2 build (Redhat 9, Kernel 2.4.25) Jeff Clifford
15:31 Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5? Albert Chin
15:09 Re: Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5? Rainer Orth
14:40 Re: rsync access seems to be broken Jonathan Larmour
14:39 Basic block duplication mcrosier
14:38 Re: Global variable clobbering and statics Diego Novillo
14:23 Re: Global variable clobbering and statics Daniel Berlin
14:22 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Diego Novillo
14:13 Re: rsync access seems to be broken Volker Reichelt
14:13 Re: rsync access seems to be broken Matthew Galgoci
14:01 Re: Global variable clobbering and statics Diego Novillo
14:01 Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions Andrew Pinski
13:55 Re: Global variable clobbering and statics Daniel Berlin
13:52 Re: Global variable clobbering and statics Diego Novillo
13:49 Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions Adriaan van Os
13:45 Re: rsync access seems to be broken Jonathan Larmour
13:39 Re: rsync access seems to be broken Daniel Berlin
13:30 Re: 4.0.2 bootstrap comparison failure on AIX 5.3 Albert Chin
13:28 Anyone build 4.0.2 on IRIX 6.5? Albert Chin
13:24 Re: Some svn numbers Daniel Berlin
13:19 Re: Some svn numbers Nix
13:08 Re: rsync access seems to be broken Daniel Berlin
12:34 Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Rainer Emrich
12:30 Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Emrich
12:28 Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Rainer Emrich
12:21 Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Emrich
12:15 Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 Rainer Emrich
07:40 Re: -fprofile-arcs and gcov: data without exit() Nathan Sidwell
07:14 rsync access seems to be broken Volker Reichelt
06:26 Regression status improving -- keep it up! Mark Mitchell
05:22 Support for init_priority in ARM EABI configurations Mark Mitchell
03:38 A New Architecture ibanez
02:49 Re: Some svn numbers Daniel Berlin
02:42 Some svn numbers Daniel Berlin
02:16 Re: Global variable clobbering and statics Daniel Berlin

October 11, 2005
22:45 gcc-3.4-20051011 is now available gccadmin
21:07 Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/sparc-frame-1.c (test for excess errors) with -m64 on sparc/sparc64 linux... Eric Botcazou
20:25 FAIL: gcc.dg/sparc-frame-1.c (test for excess errors) with -m64 on sparc/sparc64 linux... Christian Joensson
19:43 Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance Mike Stump
19:14 Re: -fprofile-arcs and gcov: data without exit() Joe Buck
17:01 Re: -fprofile-arcs and gcov: data without exit() Nathan Sidwell
15:56 Re: -fprofile-arcs and gcov: data without exit() Richard Guenther
15:55 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Peter O'Gorman
15:52 -fprofile-arcs and gcov: data without exit() Astroman (sent by Nabble.com)
03:58 Re: 4.0.2 bootstrap comparison failure on AIX 5.3 David Edelsohn
03:49 4.0.2 bootstrap comparison failure on AIX 5.3 Albert Chin
01:31 RFC: weakref GCC attribute and .weakref assembly directive Alexandre Oliva
01:31 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Alexandre Oliva
00:05 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Daniel Berlin
00:02 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Giovanni Bajo

October 10, 2005
23:57 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Daniel Berlin
23:57 Re: warning on i686-pc-cygwin bobby mcnulty
23:25 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Steve Ellcey
23:20 Thanks [was Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance] Frans Englich
23:07 Re: warning on i686-pc-cygwin Brian Dessent
22:51 warning on i686-pc-cygwin bobby mcnulty
22:44 Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance Mark Mitchell
22:41 Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance Frans Englich
22:29 Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance Mark Mitchell
22:02 Re: [gomp] Richard Henderson
21:51 Explicit NOPs for a VLIW Machine Balaji V. Iyer
21:50 regression hunt setup Janis Johnson
21:36 Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance Joe Buck
21:28 Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance Frans Englich
20:56 Re: [gomp] libgcj.so: undefined reference to `hidden alias for java::lang::Class::isArray()' and more... Diego Novillo
20:51 Re: [gomp] libgcj.so: undefined reference to `hidden alias for java::lang::Class::isArray()' and more... Christian Joensson
20:49 [gomp] Christian Joensson
18:53 Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance Mark Mitchell
18:44 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Devang Patel
18:00 Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions Mark Mitchell
17:57 Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions Steven Bosscher
17:35 Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions Mark Mitchell
17:30 Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance Frans Englich
17:10 Successful gcc 4.0.2 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1bTru64(c,c++,f95,objc,java,treelang) Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
16:12 Re: Speed impact of virtual inheritance Jonathan Wakely
15:10 Speed impact of virtual inheritance Frans Englich
14:07 Re: New branch opened: dataflow-branch Steven Bosscher
02:15 Re: [gomp] warnings in omp-low.c: In function 'omp_copy_decl' Richard Henderson

October 09, 2005
21:42 Re: Char *Foo = "ABC" or Char Foo[] = "ABC"" ? Felix Oxley
15:24 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Steven Bosscher
15:11 [gomp] warnings in omp-low.c: In function 'omp_copy_decl' Christian Joensson
13:55 Re: development Ben Elliston
13:49 Re: [obj-c++] a few current test suite failures Andrew Pinski
07:40 [obj-c++] a few current test suite failures Christian Joensson
05:29 Re: Update on GCC moving to svn Christopher Faylor
04:57 Re: Questions about comparison insns in mips.md Ian Lance Taylor
02:25 cross build gcc 4.0/4.1 fail Cauchy Song
01:40 Re: Questions about comparison insns in mips.md Eric Fisher
01:36 Jikes RVM Jeffrin
00:51 development Bill Cunningham
00:47 Update on GCC moving to svn Daniel Berlin

October 08, 2005
17:51 gcc-4.1-20051008 is now available gccadmin
17:40 Re: Questions about comparison insns in mips.md Ian Lance Taylor
15:02 Re: Char *Foo = "ABC" or Char Foo[] = "ABC"" ? Jakub Jelinek
12:50 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Gabriel Dos Reis
12:22 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Richard Kenner
09:57 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Richard Guenther
07:06 Questions about comparison insns in mips.md Eric Fisher

October 07, 2005
23:52 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Daniel Berlin
23:41 Re: RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Andrew Pinski
23:25 RFC: IPO optimization framework for GCC Steve Ellcey
19:33 Re: DejaGNU test case assistance please? Janis Johnson
19:06 Re: DejaGNU test case assistance please? Kean Johnston
18:40 Re: Char *Foo = "ABC" or Char Foo[] = "ABC"" ? Richard Henderson
18:31 Re: Char *Foo = "ABC" or Char Foo[] = "ABC"" ? Joe Buck
18:06 Char *Foo = "ABC" or Char Foo[] = "ABC"" ? Felix Oxley
18:03 Re: DejaGNU test case assistance please? Janis Johnson
13:49 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Daniel Berlin
13:20 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Olivier Hainque
12:22 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Richard Kenner
12:20 PR 22082: Trouble linking with 64-bit libgcc on powerpc-darwin Bradley Lucier
12:14 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Richard Kenner
11:49 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Daniel Berlin
11:31 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Richard Kenner
11:26 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Daniel Berlin
08:48 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Olivier Hainque
08:45 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Olivier Hainque
08:32 DejaGNU test case assistance please? Kean Johnston

October 06, 2005
22:46 gcc-4.0-20051006 is now available gccadmin
21:41 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Mike Stump
21:39 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Daniel Berlin
20:58 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Richard Henderson
20:23 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Olivier Hainque
16:55 Re: SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Daniel Berlin
16:00 SEGV in do_simple_structure_copy Olivier Hainque
15:45 Re: Problems with the m32c target and M16C6N cpu Frank von Zeppelin
15:16 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Robert Dewar
14:55 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Jan Beulich
14:18 New branch opened: dataflow-branch Daniel Berlin
14:03 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Wolfgang Roemer
13:55 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Michael Veksler
13:38 Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Jan Beulich
13:22 Re: Question about Machine Description Richard Sandiford
13:16 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Wolfgang Roemer
13:13 Procesos Preventivos en la Administracion Publica //*0510518601558adr Ochenta Cursos Gubernamentales
12:51 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Robert Dewar
12:45 Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Wolfgang Roemer
10:37 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Robert Dewar
10:23 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Wolfgang Roemer
09:57 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Robert Dewar
09:45 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Michael Veksler
09:04 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Wolfgang Roemer
08:33 Re: Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Michael Veksler
07:52 Bug or feature: symbol names of global/extern variables Wolfgang Roemer

October 05, 2005
16:57 Re: target-defs.h / tm.h question Kean Johnston
16:25 Types of allowed regions in sched-rgn.c mcrosier
15:38 Re: target-defs.h / tm.h question Joseph S. Myers
14:33 target-defs.h / tm.h question Kean Johnston
13:26 Re: Ada question about PR 18434 Arnaud Charlet
13:25 Re: Expanding sh maintainership for Kaz Kojima Kaz Kojima
13:22 Re: Expanding sh maintainership for Kaz Kojima Gerald Pfeifer
13:13 Re: Expanding sh maintainership for Kaz Kojima Kaz Kojima
12:56 Re: Expanding sh maintainership for Kaz Kojima Gerald Pfeifer
12:06 Re: Ada question about PR 18434 Rainer Orth
12:06 Re: Expanding sh maintainership for Kaz Kojima Kaz Kojima
11:50 Re: Expanding sh maintainership for Kaz Kojima Gerald Pfeifer
11:23 Re: Expanding sh maintainership for Kaz Kojima Kaz Kojima
10:50 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-10-02) Diego Novillo
10:43 Expanding sh maintainership for Kaz Kojima Gerald Pfeifer
08:27 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp Paolo Bonzini
06:23 Successful build of gcc 4.0.2 on alphaev56-dec-osf5.1b (c, c++, treelang) SOLCIA Ivano
00:05 Re: Cross GCC on Cygwin Christopher Faylor

October 04, 2005
22:43 gcc-3.4-20051004 is now available gccadmin
21:14 Re: gcc 4.1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_integer_kind_1.f90 on sparc/sparc64 linux... Christian Joensson
20:23 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Jonathan Wakely
20:18 Re: gcc 4.1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_integer_kind_1.f90 on sparc/sparc64 linux... Janis Johnson
20:17 Re: gcc 4.1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_integer_kind_1.f90 on sparc/sparc64 linux... Janis Johnson
18:39 Re: problems with writing a new pass worm book
18:15 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp Richard Henderson
17:10 Re: RFC: redundant stores in C++ Dale Johannesen
17:07 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp Dale Johannesen
13:46 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Tommy Vercetti
13:39 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Peter Lupton NCH Swift Sound
13:23 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp? Richard Henderson
13:19 Re: [URGENT] GCC 4.0 Nomination Jon Masters
12:37 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-10-02) Daniel Berlin
12:10 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Richard Guenther
12:01 Re: [URGENT] GCC 4.0 Nomination Joern RENNECKE
11:42 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Peter Lupton NCH Swift Sound
10:47 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-10-02) FX Coudert
10:43 Re: gcc 4.1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_integer_kind_1.f90 on sparc/sparc64linux... FX Coudert
10:39 Re: gcc 4.1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_integer_kind_1.f90 on sparc/sparc64 linux... Christian Joensson
10:24 Re: gcc 4.1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_integer_kind_1.f90 on sparc/sparc64linux... FX Coudert
10:02 success: gcc @ RH9.0 Shrike Fotis Georgatos
09:58 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp? Paolo Bonzini
09:20 gcc 4.1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_integer_kind_1.f90 on sparc/sparc64 linux... Christian Joensson
08:07 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp? Uros Bizjak
07:06 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp? Uros Bizjak
06:46 GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-10-02) Mark Mitchell
04:48 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
04:38 Re: Question about Machine Description Balaji V. Iyer
03:59 Re: Question about Machine Description Ian Lance Taylor
00:45 Question about Machine Description Balaji V. Iyer

October 03, 2005
23:01 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Ben Elliston
23:00 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Janis Johnson
22:49 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp Andrew Pinski
22:49 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Ben Elliston
22:46 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp Eric Christopher
22:41 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp Evan Cheng
22:25 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp Andrew Pinski
21:56 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp Evan Cheng
21:44 Re: Should -msse3 enable fisttp? Evan Cheng
21:03 Re: libjawtgnu linking borked Tom Tromey
20:54 Re: [RFC][PATHC] Attack PR12245 by fiddling with CONSTRUCTOR Richard Henderson
20:33 Re: Cross GCC on Cygwin Ivan Novick
17:52 [RFC][PATHC] Attack PR12245 by fiddling with CONSTRUCTOR Richard Guenther
17:47 Re: [URGENT] GCC 4.0 Nomination Joe Buck
16:35 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Mike Stump
16:25 Re: Cross GCC on Cygwin Mike Stump
10:04 Re: problems with writing a new pass Paolo Bonzini
08:51 problems with writing a new pass worm book
07:23 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Marcin Dalecki
06:27 GCC Installation Problem - Please help.... Renju Anand
04:05 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Peter O'Gorman
02:07 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Marcin Dalecki
00:27 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Nicholas Nethercote

October 02, 2005
23:16 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Marcin Dalecki
23:08 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Marcin Dalecki
22:51 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Shantonu Sen
22:44 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Marcin Dalecki
22:27 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Andrew Pinski
22:24 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Paolo Bonzini
22:19 Re: Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Marcin Dalecki
21:31 Fishy build system: make_exports.pl called on darwin? Marcin Dalecki
19:38 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Kean Johnston
19:08 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Daniel Jacobowitz
18:35 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Daniel Berlin
18:33 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Kean Johnston
18:07 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Daniel Berlin
18:06 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Tommy Vercetti
17:31 [3.4] fixup_reorder_chain fix Jan Hubicka
17:27 Re: Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Kean Johnston
16:59 Re: Bugzilla error Daniel Berlin
16:54 Re: Bugzilla error Daniel Berlin
16:54 Moving to subversion, gonna eat me a lot of peaches Daniel Berlin
16:39 Bugzilla error Jonathan Wakely
15:55 Re: [URGENT] GCC 4.0 Nomination Jon Masters
15:51 Re: gcc Joe Buck
15:48 Re: [URGENT] GCC 4.0 Nomination Andrew Haley
15:42 [URGENT] GCC 4.0 Nomination Jon Masters
13:00 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Bernhard R. Link
12:28 gcc Bill Cunningham
10:13 [gomp] import gcc/stor-layout.c pls Christian Joensson
03:41 Re: RFC: redundant stores in C++ Andrew Pinski
03:20 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Peter Lupton NCH Swift Sound
03:12 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Robert Dewar
03:10 Re: RFC: redundant stores in C++ Dale Johannesen
03:07 Re: Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans Andrew Pinski
03:04 Wishlish: GCC option for explicit booleans pl
02:30 Re: RFC: redundant stores in C++ Andrew Pinski
02:12 Re: fwprop patch testing Steven Bosscher
02:11 Re: incompatible 'improvements' Scott Robert Ladd
02:11 Re: gcc -I- feature nmake Technical Support
02:11 RFC: redundant stores in C++ Dale Johannesen
02:11 Re: libjawtgnu linking borked Andreas Schwab
01:36 Stopping getting emails about bug reconfirmations Daniel Berlin

October 01, 2005
19:58 Re: libjawtgnu linking borked Tom Tromey
19:14 gcc-4.1-20051001 is now available gccadmin
18:48 Re: fwprop patch testing Segher Boessenkool
18:01 Re: Error: Local symbol '.LTHUNK0' can't be equated to ...... Alexandre Oliva
17:31 Re: Ada question about PR 18434 Robert Dewar
15:51 Re: libjawtgnu linking borked Andreas Jaeger
15:42 Re: x86 SSE constants Jan Hubicka
14:28 Re: fwprop patch testing Steven Bosscher
14:25 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers Mike Kumbera
14:02 Re: Ada question about PR 18434 Laurent GUERBY
12:37 Re: Ada question about PR 18434 Robert Dewar
12:05 Re: Cross GCC on Cygwin Christian Joensson
11:41 Cross GCC on Cygwin Brian Rose
09:47 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Eric Botcazou
09:34 Re: incompatible 'improvements' Steven Bosscher
08:59 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Mark Mitchell
08:58 Amazon.com Inquiry Amazon
08:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Mark Mitchell
05:35 Re: incompatible 'improvements' Joe Buck
02:27 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Richard Kenner
01:21 Re: gcc -I- feature Andrew Pinski
00:46 Re: gcc -I- feature Neil Booth
00:25 Re: x86 SSE constants Richard Henderson
00:12 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Richard Henderson
00:11 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Richard Henderson
00:05 Re: incompatible 'improvements' Robert Dewar

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3