This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jkj at sco dot com, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:46:02 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
References: <200509301316.j8UDGmQX024302@53v30g15.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <433D8BD2.3080303@sco.com> <433DAD09.8010404@codesourcery.com> <200510010100.04140.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>I've decided not to do another release.  I think it's too much effort
>>for too little gain.  The C++ and m68k patches are things that might
>>just as easily not have been applied in the first place; we certainly
>>wouldn't have considered either PR a showstopper.  The Solaris problem
>>is unfortunate, but I think not fatal.
> 
> 
> Agreed.  But I'm requesting a "caveat" note about the Solaris regression here:
>   http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html#4.0.2
> mentioning the workaround (g++ -pthreads) and the link:
>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-09/msg00984.html

Roger that.  I'll take care of it as soon as I can.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
  - From: Kean Johnston
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]