This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,jkj at sco dot com,Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 01:00:03 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
References: <200509301316.j8UDGmQX024302@53v30g15.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <433D8BD2.3080303@sco.com> <433DAD09.8010404@codesourcery.com>

> I've decided not to do another release.  I think it's too much effort
> for too little gain.  The C++ and m68k patches are things that might
> just as easily not have been applied in the first place; we certainly
> wouldn't have considered either PR a showstopper.  The Solaris problem
> is unfortunate, but I think not fatal.

Agreed.  But I'm requesting a "caveat" note about the Solaris regression here:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html#4.0.2
mentioning the workaround (g++ -pthreads) and the link:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-09/msg00984.html

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
  - From: Kean Johnston
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]