This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0)
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>
- Cc: law at redhat dot com, Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:15:11 -0400
- Subject: Re: reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0)
- References: <200501190042.j0J0g9Re011339@53v30g15.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <41EE5DBB.8060105@t-online.de> <01a001c4ffd9$4bcc8fe0$bf03030a@trilan> <1106329274.30575.250.camel@localhost.localdomain> <423B1AAF.5020207@t-online.de>
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 07:15:11PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> >On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 17:50 +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> >
> >>Why not putting it on a branch? If you are going to finish and submit it
> >>for
> >>4.1, it might be easier to use CVS.
> >
> >It might also be easier for those of us who want to play with the code,
> >without having to find a suitable sync point between the patch and
> >mainline sources.
>
> I have created a new branch, "reload-branch", on which I'm going to
> check in these changes. Once I've done that, I'll commit the patch
> below to mention the branch in the documentation.
Hey Bernd,
Has there been any news or progress on reload-branch lately? It
removes a lot of code that I'd dearly love to see gone...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC