This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:26:36 -0500
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993
References: <20050921103222.4ebe43f2.bkoz@redhat.com><200509222021.51014.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

> > I have. I am awaiting solaris test details.
> 
> Not very good: regressions on Solaris 2.6, 7, 8 and 9.
> 
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_allocate_big_per_type.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_delete.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_new.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-1.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-3.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-1.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-3.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-1.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-2.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-3.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-4.cc execution test

Yes, I saw this with Joe Buck's results yesterday. Further details have
not been available.

These new fails are annoying, but not release-critical, and seem to be
confined to Solaris. I'm not quite sure what is going on: can you send
me your libstdc++ log file please?

-benjamin

References:
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]