This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Regards, wen-mei
Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 10:53, Robert Dewar wrote:I would add single compiler for other linux (and non-linux) ports, more compact code for Itanium (sometimes 2 times more compact), many additional features (last ones are mudflap and stack protector). If it was perfomance only, people would have switched to Intel, ORC or Openimpact compilers long ago. But according Gelato poll, most of Itanium users (like 70%) prefer to use gcc than other compilers.
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Surely this depends on relative performance ...(If so, I'm wondering what it's going to buy the interested parties, because I have a hard time seeing one of the large GNU/Linux distributors switching to a compiler different from FSF GCC for Itanium.)
My guess is that there are more important things than performance, such as stability, community support, maintenance burden, etc.
_______________________________________________ Gelato-gcc mailing list Gelato-gcc@gelato.unsw.edu.au https://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/gelato-gcc
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |