This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: New port contribution - picoChip
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'David Edelsohn'" <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>,"'Steven Bosscher'" <stevenb at suse dot de>
- Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"'Giovanni Bajo'" <rasky at develer dot com>,<daniel dot towner dot picochip dot com at makai dot watson dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:03:42 +0100
- Subject: RE: New port contribution - picoChip
----Original Message----
>From: David Edelsohn
>Sent: 12 September 2005 19:00
> A similar issue was raised last Spring and discussed by the GCC
> Steering Committee. Mark Mitchell summarized the response, including
> Richard Stallman's comment:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-06/msg00134.html
" There is no need to have a uniform policy about it. There is no
compelling reason to treat all such cases alike. "
> There is no need to resurrect that debate.
I will not post to this thread again. Everyone else can do as they please
AFAIC.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....