This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded

From: Olivier Hainque <hainque at adacore dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, hainque at adacore dot com
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 22:40:35 +0200
Subject: Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
References: <20050909143010.A18873@rome.act-europe.fr> <764e014e681b7720aa37b8216666e0ee@physics.uc.edu> <20050909165105.B20437@rome.act-europe.fr>

Olivier Hainque wrote:
>  I'm not yet clear why the call is not issued there. This is my first
>  dive in the gimplifier, so it might well be simple.

 FWIW, I think part of the problem is that TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS is not
 set on the constructor, despite the presence of a function call in
 the components.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
  - From: Olivier Hainque
- Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
  - From: Olivier Hainque

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]