gcc archive
date index for September, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2005
23:46 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Mark Mitchell
23:43 incompatible 'improvements' George White
23:32 Re: x86 SSE constants Dale Johannesen
23:17 Re: x86 SSE constants Jan Hubicka
23:05 Confusion with tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 Richard Kenner
22:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Eric Botcazou
22:39 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers David Edelsohn
22:31 Error: Local symbol '.LTHUNK0' can't be equated to ...... Benjamin Redelings
22:30 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers Steve Kargl
21:24 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Mark Mitchell
21:10 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers David Edelsohn
21:06 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers Daniel Jacobowitz
21:01 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers Steven Bosscher
20:29 Ada question about PR 18434 Laurent GUERBY
19:53 x86 SSE constants Dale Johannesen
19:47 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Richard Henderson
19:03 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Kean Johnston
18:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
18:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Matthias Klose
18:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Joe Buck
18:15 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Joe Buck
18:05 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Daniel Jacobowitz
18:05 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Joe Buck
18:01 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released H. J. Lu
17:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Ian Lance Taylor
17:54 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Mark Mitchell
17:50 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Andrew Pinski
17:47 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Daniel Jacobowitz
17:09 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Richard Kenner
17:06 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Daniel Berlin
17:06 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Mark Mitchell
16:50 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Haren Visavadia
16:42 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Richard Kenner
16:30 Re: Question about updating CFG block counters in purge_dead_edges [was "Questionon bad counters."] Peter Steinmetz
16:04 Question on bad counters. Peter Steinmetz
15:31 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Daniel Berlin
15:18 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Richard Kenner
15:03 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Daniel Berlin
14:58 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Olivier Hainque
14:43 TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT(bitsizetype) one-liner Bernd Jendrissek
14:32 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Daniel Berlin
14:30 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Olivier Hainque
13:56 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Daniel Berlin
13:55 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Olivier Hainque
13:32 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Daniel Berlin
13:26 Re: [gomp] build problem Diego Novillo
13:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Ulrich Weigand
13:16 [gomp] build problem f11235813
11:07 Re: Any plan to support Windows/x86-64? Nick Clifton
09:25 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Olivier Hainque
07:52 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Mark Mitchell
06:13 Re: Windows GUI apps cross-compiled from Linux or Mac OS X? Ranjit Mathew
05:06 Re: Windows GUI apps cross-compiled from Linux or Mac OS X? Ian Lance Taylor
04:30 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Christian Joensson
03:33 Windows GUI apps cross-compiled from Linux or Mac OS X? Chase
01:40 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Richard Kenner
01:30 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Richard Henderson
01:19 gcc-4.0-20050929 is now available gccadmin
01:12 root tree gcc Humberto Rocha
00:33 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Daniel Berlin
00:21 Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp? Ulrich Weigand

September 29, 2005
22:13 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Eric Botcazou
21:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Richard Kenner
21:13 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
20:48 Should -msse3 enable fisttp Evan Cheng
20:08 Re: Computed Values in Preprocessor Joe Buck
19:48 3.3/3.4 HOT_TEXT_SECTION_NAME problem H. J. Lu
19:31 Computed Values in Preprocessor aetherane (sent by Nabble.com)
17:10 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Christian Joensson
17:04 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Eric Botcazou
16:36 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Richard Henderson
16:32 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Ulrich Weigand
15:59 ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note Shaun Jackman
14:39 libjawtgnu linking borked Richard Guenther
13:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Mark Mitchell
12:41 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released (successful build) Clemens Koller
11:29 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Richard Kenner
10:47 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
10:22 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released Clemens Koller
07:30 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Andreas Jaeger
07:16 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Arnaud Charlet
04:30 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Peter O'Gorman
04:09 GCC 4.0 branch open Mark Mitchell
04:05 GCC 4.0.2 Released Mark Mitchell

September 28, 2005
20:28 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada) Laurent GUERBY
19:33 [gnu.org #252800] Tony Wieczorek via RT
19:20 Re: Query regarding execute test 960521-1. c in gcc.c-torture Ian Lance Taylor
19:10 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status Christian Joensson
18:03 RFC: Adding test cases from the OpenMP standard spec Diego Novillo
16:14 Query regarding execute test 960521-1. c in gcc.c-torture Saurabh Verma
14:31 Re: Possible bug in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:prepare_decl_rtl? Zdenek Dvorak
14:18 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status Christian Joensson
12:44 Re: Error detected at make.adb:7224:23 Christian Joensson
12:38 Possible bug in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:prepare_decl_rtl? Richard Sandiford
12:11 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Daniel Towner
12:04 Error detected at make.adb:7224:23 Christian Joensson
11:50 Re: regression for ada on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Orth
11:14 Re: regression for ada on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Emrich
10:25 Re: regression for ada on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Orth
09:02 regression for ada on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Emrich
03:16 Re: Some Question abou libstdc++ Ian Lance Taylor
02:10 Some Question abou libstdc++ Zhan Zhaohua
00:02 gcc-3.4-20050927 is now available gccadmin

September 27, 2005
20:43 Re: reload-branch created Bernd Schmidt
17:56 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status Mark Mitchell
17:55 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status H. J. Lu
17:47 reload_in<mode> conflicts (Was: Re: [patch RFC] SH: PR target/21623) Joern RENNECKE
15:08 Re: query: -fshort-enums is default on which targets ? Andreas Schwab
14:58 GCC 4.0.2 Status Mark Mitchell
13:06 query: -fshort-enums is default on which targets ? Gaurav Gautam, Noida
03:37 Re: fixed registers in mips Ian Lance Taylor
02:34 fixed registers in mips Eric Fisher
01:07 Re: DERIVED_FROM_P Mike Stump
00:25 DERIVED_FROM_P Humberto Rocha

September 26, 2005
21:15 Re: reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0) Daniel Jacobowitz
20:15 Re: The behaviours of the pointers according to the operating system Ian Lance Taylor
20:03 The behaviours of the pointers according to the operating system sek_saf_on (sent by Nabble.com
18:03 Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory Mike Stump
16:05 Re: [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression Fariborz Jahanian
13:51 Re: Gomp and C++? Diego Novillo
13:35 Gomp and C++? Martin Reinecke
09:48 Re: PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier Richard Guenther
08:38 Re: fwprop patch testing Paolo Bonzini
07:08 Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory Paolo Bonzini
03:40 Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory Mike Stump
03:00 Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory Ben Elliston

September 25, 2005
22:55 Re: bad web link on mirrors page Gerald Pfeifer
20:14 Re: System header warning exemptions and delta debugging don't mix well caj
17:10 Re: PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier Ian Lance Taylor
14:55 Re: PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier Daniel Berlin
11:13 g++.dg not having one .exp per directory Paolo Bonzini
09:36 Re: Compile Without Libc Ian Lance Taylor
09:28 Compile Without Libc aetherane (sent by Nabble.com)
09:25 Re: PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier Ian Lance Taylor
09:19 PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier Ian Lance Taylor
08:30 Re: [4.0] version '400p', expected version '400*' Christian Joensson
08:30 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3 Christian Joensson

September 24, 2005
23:20 Re: Insn for direct increment of memory? Paul Brook
22:58 Re: Insn for direct increment of memory? Greg McGary
22:52 Re: Insn for direct increment of memory? Paul Brook
22:36 Insn for direct increment of memory? Greg McGary
18:06 gcc-4.1-20050924 is now available gccadmin
17:40 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Gerald Pfeifer
16:48 Re: A peculiar problem Michael Veksler
16:01 A peculiar problem Audison Athena
15:04 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Gabriel Dos Reis
14:48 Re: Warning C vs C++ Kai Henningsen
14:48 Re: Warning C vs C++ Kai Henningsen
14:29 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Alisdair Meredith
14:07 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Gabriel Dos Reis
13:44 Re: System header warning exemptions and delta debugging don't mix well Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:43 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Alisdair Meredith
10:40 Re: Warning C vs C++ Marc Espie
09:12 System header warning exemptions and delta debugging don't mix well dank
08:44 Re: [4.0] version '400p', expected version '400*' Christian Joensson

September 23, 2005
23:23 Re: c++ default operators David Daney
22:44 Re: c++ default operators Joe Buck
22:10 Re: Question about the use of builtins in altivec.h Andrew Pinski
21:30 Question about the use of builtins in altivec.h Ilya Lipovsky
21:02 Re: gcc-4.0.2: supporting -fvisibility for solaris ld Mike Stump
20:30 Re: [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression Fariborz Jahanian
19:41 Re: [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression Richard Henderson
19:26 Re: warning about classpath import Tom Tromey
18:37 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3 Mark Mitchell
18:34 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3 Benjamin Kosnik
17:25 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3 Christian Joensson
17:21 [4.0] version '400p', expected version '400*' Christian Joensson
17:15 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS) Devang Patel
17:09 c++ default operators Tommy Vercetti
16:45 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3 Mark Mitchell
16:43 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3 Mark Mitchell
15:38 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
15:31 gcc-4.0.2: supporting -fvisibility for solaris ld Andrew Morrow
14:57 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
14:21 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug John Love-Jensen
14:19 Re: Questionable code in fixup_reorder_chain Eric Botcazou
14:06 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Daniel Berlin
14:06 RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Gaurav Gautam, Noida
13:55 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Andreas Krebbel
12:15 Re: Questionable code in fixup_reorder_chain Jan Hubicka
09:34 RE: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Dave Korn
09:16 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Bernhard R. Link
02:39 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS) Kenneth Zadeck
02:27 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:14 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS) Daniel Berlin
01:50 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS) Devang Patel
01:32 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
01:28 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
01:16 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Hank Kester
01:09 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
01:07 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Mike Stump
00:40 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
00:39 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
00:18 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Geoffrey Keating
00:00 gcc-4.0-20050922 is now available gccadmin

September 22, 2005
22:41 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Mike Stump
20:27 Re: [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression Andrew Pinski
20:23 [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression Fariborz Jahanian
20:21 Re: arguements used in .c.26.flow2 are not used in assembly codes Ian Lance Taylor
19:46 bad web link on mirrors page george young
19:35 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3 Christian Joensson
19:03 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Paul Brook
18:39 Questionable code in fixup_reorder_chain Eric Botcazou
18:31 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Daniel Jacobowitz
18:27 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993 Benjamin Kosnik
18:24 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3 Eric Botcazou
18:21 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993 Eric Botcazou
17:46 Re: warning about classpath import Tom Tromey
17:46 Re: warning about classpath import Tom Tromey
17:25 GCC 4.0.2 RC2 RTEMS Report Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
16:51 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Robert Dewar
16:41 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Gabriel Dos Reis
16:33 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug John Love-Jensen
16:28 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug John Love-Jensen
16:26 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Gabriel Dos Reis
16:20 RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Dave Korn
16:15 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Daniel Jacobowitz
16:11 GCC 4.0.2 RC3 Mark Mitchell
15:36 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug John Love-Jensen
15:32 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Neil Booth
15:19 Re: [gomp] implement a handfull of easy directives Ian Lance Taylor
14:51 Re: warning about classpath import Gerald Pfeifer
14:44 Re: warning about classpath import Tom Tromey
14:42 RE: warning about classpath import Dave Korn
14:30 Re: warning about classpath import Tom Tromey
13:40 RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Gaurav Gautam, Noida
13:40 Re: [gomp] implement a handfull of easy directives Daniel Berlin
13:34 Succesfull build on i386-unknown-freebsd5.3 Stargrave
12:37 Problems with collect2, linking libgcc twice causing duplicate symbols Jussi Mononen
10:45 arguements used in .c.26.flow2 are not used in assembly codes Liu Haibin
10:38 RE: warning about classpath import Dave Korn
09:33 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS) Steven Bosscher
09:25 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS) Zdenek Dvorak
09:09 Re: warning about classpath import Andrew Haley
08:29 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS) Paolo Bonzini
06:06 Re: make distclean can not remove intl/config.cache Yao Qi
04:54 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Ian Lance Taylor
04:43 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
04:36 Re: [gomp] implement a handfull of easy directives Ian Lance Taylor
04:09 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis

September 21, 2005
23:12 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993 Mark Mitchell
22:57 Re: warning about classpath import David Daney
21:00 Re: Segmentation Fault building GCC for i686-pc-mingw32 TJ Laurenzo
19:53 Re: Warning C vs C++ DJ Delorie
19:38 Re: Warning C vs C++ Kai Henningsen
19:38 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Kai Henningsen
19:36 warning about classpath import Tom Tromey
19:10 Re: make distclean can not remove intl/config.cache Ian Lance Taylor
19:02 moene.indiv.nluug.nl is back in business (black and white only, though). Toon Moene
17:26 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Daniel Jacobowitz
17:26 Re: failed to build libgfortran gcc-4.0.1 on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Orth
17:20 Request for testsuite help (gcc.dg/compat) Steve Ellcey
16:43 [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS) Vladimir Yanovsky
15:48 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993 Giovanni Bajo
15:47 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993 Paolo Carlini
15:42 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Andreas Schwab
15:32 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993 Benjamin Kosnik
14:55 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Robert Dewar
14:28 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993 Eric Botcazou
14:20 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.c failed on my port Daniel Berlin
14:19 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Daniel Jacobowitz
14:13 Re: Segmentation Fault building GCC for i686-pc-mingw32 Ranjit Mathew
13:51 GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993 Mark Mitchell
13:35 RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Gaurav Gautam, Noida
12:39 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Daniel Jacobowitz
12:17 No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug Gaurav Gautam, Noida
11:10 Re: Problem with gcc 4.0.1 Ernest L. Williams Jr.
08:51 Re: Problem with gcc 4.0.1 Paolo Bonzini
08:41 unwind-dw2-fde.c failed on my port Eric Fisher
07:49 Re: fortran-testcase/dce question Dorit Naishlos
05:24 make distclean can not remove intl/config.cache Yao Qi
04:22 Re: Warning C vs C++ Ben Elliston
02:53 Final GCC 4.0.2 Code Freeze Mark Mitchell
02:21 Problem with gcc 4.0.1 Ernest L. Williams Jr.
02:05 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge

September 20, 2005
23:57 gcc-3.4-20050920 is now available gccadmin
21:59 Segmentation Fault building GCC for i686-pc-mingw32 TJ Laurenzo
20:57 reg_used_between_p vs. CLOBBER Joern RENNECKE
20:31 Re: Array to Double. N V Krishna
19:08 Re: Question on syntax in machine description files. David Edelsohn
19:05 Question on syntax in machine description files. Peter Steinmetz
18:20 Re: Array to Double. Mike Stump
17:57 Re: Build DDG from multiple BBs Daniel Berlin
17:50 Build DDG from multiple BBs mcrosier
17:36 Re: installing problem Mike Stump
17:23 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Dale Johannesen
16:40 Re: Warning C vs C++ Mark Mitchell
15:10 Re: fortran-testcase/dce question Andrew Pinski
15:09 Re: fortran-testcase/dce question Andrew Pinski
14:38 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs trunk on cygwin: Andrew Pinski
14:07 Re: How set an iterator to NULL chris jefferson
13:54 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Daniel Berlin
13:46 How set an iterator to NULL Michael Cieslinski
13:44 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Giovanni Bajo
11:47 Failure to build gcc cvs trunk on cygwin: Christian Joensson
11:43 RE: Calling functions on x86 Dave Korn
11:14 Calling functions on x86 patriciak784-gccmainling
07:41 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Paolo Bonzini
06:57 fortran-testcase/dce question Dorit Naishlos
06:44 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Gabriel Dos Reis
06:43 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend Yao qi
06:07 installing problem Hitha Nambiar
06:03 Array to Double. N V Krishna
04:59 unwind-dw2-fde.c failed on my port Eric Fisher
04:18 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Richard Henderson
04:06 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
03:19 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Mark Mitchell
02:05 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Daniel Berlin
01:46 RE: 15 Sept notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call Mark K. Smith
00:39 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:34 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Dale Johannesen
00:30 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Richard Henderson
00:19 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Dale Johannesen
00:02 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Zack Weinberg

September 19, 2005
23:12 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Janis Johnson
22:59 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Kaz Kojima
21:40 Re: [gelato-gcc] 15 Sept notes from GCC improvement for Itaniumconference call Daniel Berlin
21:00 15 Sept notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call Mark K. Smith
20:46 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Eric Botcazou
20:24 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Andrew Pinski
20:21 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Eric Botcazou
20:13 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Andrew Pinski
20:04 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Eric Botcazou
19:38 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Paul Brook
19:35 RE: "gcc -pipe" and ld Dave Korn
19:32 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:23 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Mike Stump
19:20 Re: "gcc -pipe" and ld Andreas Schwab
19:06 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Mike Stump
18:22 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Gabriel Dos Reis
18:18 "gcc -pipe" and ld Erik Leunissen
18:16 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Gabriel Dos Reis
18:11 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Daniel Jacobowitz
18:10 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Eric Botcazou
17:51 Re: constructors and multiple entry points Andrew Pinski
17:45 constructors and multiple entry points Gabriel Dos Reis
16:35 Re: Warning C vs C++ Tommy Vercetti
16:09 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Christopher Faylor
15:05 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Andrew Pinski
14:34 Re: Mapping range of addresses shreyas krishnan
14:32 Re: pointer checking run time code Robert Dewar
14:27 Re: Mapping range of addresses Paul Koning
14:25 Re: Mapping range of addresses Robert Dewar
14:14 Mapping range of addresses shreyas krishnan
14:11 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Giovanni Bajo
14:10 RE: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Dave Korn
14:05 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Daniel Berlin
13:33 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Jakub Jelinek
13:32 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Richard Guenther
13:31 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Gerald Pfeifer
13:23 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Daniel Berlin
13:22 Re: Warning C vs C++ Per Abrahamsen
13:17 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:07 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Jakub Jelinek
13:03 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Daniel Berlin
13:01 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:01 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Daniel Berlin
13:01 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Paolo Bonzini
12:59 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
12:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Etienne Lorrain
12:37 Re: Warning C vs C++ Robert Dewar
12:31 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Paolo Bonzini
12:23 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Etienne Lorrain
12:20 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Gerald Pfeifer
12:13 Re: Gcc 4.1 has been failing SPEC CPU 2000 on 64bit platforms Paolo Bonzini
11:48 RE: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Dave Korn
11:30 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Giovanni Bajo
11:17 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Sebastian Pop
11:10 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:09 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
10:50 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Giovanni Bajo
10:47 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Gerald Pfeifer
10:40 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Giovanni Bajo
10:34 RE: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Dave Korn
10:33 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Florian Weimer
10:29 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
10:26 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Richard Henderson
10:16 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Eric Botcazou
10:02 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Sebastian Pop
09:49 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
09:38 Re: Warning C vs C++ Per Abrahamsen
09:20 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Richard Henderson
09:18 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Richard Henderson
09:09 Undefined behavior in genautomata.c? Sebastian Pop
05:32 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Andreas Tobler
04:56 Re: Gcc 4.1 has been failing SPEC CPU 2000 on 64bit platforms Andrew Pinski
04:47 Gcc 4.1 has been failing SPEC CPU 2000 on 64bit platforms H. J. Lu

September 18, 2005
23:11 Re: Warning C vs C++ Joe Buck
21:44 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Ulrich Weigand
20:47 [PATCH]: Re: data dependence for pointers broken? Daniel Berlin
20:27 Re: data dependence for pointers broken? Daniel Berlin
20:24 Re: data dependence for pointers broken? Daniel Berlin
19:59 data dependence for pointers broken? Richard Henderson
19:24 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Laurent GUERBY
18:31 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:59 Re: pointer checking run time code Florian Weimer
16:54 Re: Warning C vs C++ Florian Weimer
16:52 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Zack Weinberg
16:42 GCC 4.0.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
15:26 Re: Cost of having an immediate use in the phi argument Daniel Berlin
13:13 Re: Cost of having an immediate use in the phi argument Andrew MacLeod
01:11 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Gabriel Dos Reis

September 17, 2005
23:20 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Zack Weinberg
22:53 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Gerald Pfeifer
22:34 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Gabriel Dos Reis
22:10 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Zack Weinberg
22:00 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
18:59 Cost of having an immediate use in the phi argument Daniel Berlin
18:12 gcc-4.1-20050917 is now available gccadmin
17:18 Re: pointer checking run time code Mike Stump
17:12 Re: pointer checking run time code Mike Stump
16:15 Re: Warning C vs C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:11 Re: Warning C vs C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:10 Re: Warning C vs C++ Robert Dewar
16:01 Re: Warning C vs C++ Tommy Vercetti
15:59 Re: Warning C vs C++ Robert Dewar
15:57 Re: Warning C vs C++ Tommy Vercetti
15:55 Re: Warning C vs C++ Robert Dewar
15:45 Re: Warning C vs C++ Robert Dewar
15:20 Re: [PATCH] fix warnings in treelang/parse.y Gabriel Dos Reis
15:18 Re: Warning C vs C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
14:54 Re: Warning C vs C++ Tommy Vercetti
14:44 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available David Edelsohn
14:43 Re: [PATCH] fix warnings in treelang/parse.y Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
14:23 Re: Warning C vs C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
14:22 Re: Warning C vs C++ Joseph S. Myers
13:59 Re: Warning C vs C++ Tommy Vercetti
13:58 Re: pointer checking run time code Robert Dewar
13:41 pointer checking run time code shreyas krishnan
13:17 Re: Warning C vs C++ Ian Lance Taylor
12:13 Warning C vs C++ Vassili Karpov
09:52 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Richard Sandiford
04:31 Re: [PATCH] fix warnings in treelang/parse.y Gabriel Dos Reis
04:07 [PATCH] fix warnings in treelang/parse.y Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola

September 16, 2005
23:09 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Joseph S. Myers
22:57 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Joseph S. Myers
22:37 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid? Mark Mitchell
22:26 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid? Ian Lance Taylor
21:27 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Eric Botcazou
21:26 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Paul Eggert
20:58 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
20:44 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:28 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid? Mark Mitchell
20:27 Re: RFC: dbxout_type rewrite Devang Patel
20:21 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid? Ian Lance Taylor
20:18 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Joe Buck
20:18 Re: problems in C functions call C++ Daniel Jacobowitz
20:14 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Geoffrey Keating
20:14 Re: RFC: dbxout_type rewrite Geoffrey Keating
19:55 Re: problems in C functions call C++ Tommy Vercetti
19:42 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Zack Weinberg
19:30 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid? Mark Mitchell
19:24 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Mike Stump
18:58 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:29 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Geoff Keating
17:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
17:38 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Joe Buck
17:15 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
17:08 Re: problems in C functions call C++ Joe Buck
17:06 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Paul Brook
17:01 problems in C functions call C++ Tian Dale-A19565
16:41 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Joe Buck
15:38 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
12:12 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Joseph S. Myers
09:53 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Geoffrey Keating
09:22 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Christian Joensson
08:50 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Geoffrey Keating
07:44 Re: Where are the fortran test results for cv strunk? Andrey Belevantsev
07:35 Re: Where are the fortran test results for cv strunk? Christian Joensson
07:12 Re: Where are the fortran test results for cv strunk? Steven Bosscher
05:47 Where are the fortran test results for cv strunk? Christian Joensson
05:42 PR c++/11987: why is it invalid? Ian Lance Taylor
05:11 RFC: TLS improvements for IA32 and AMD64/EM64T Alexandre Oliva
02:40 Re: Can we have a symbol_ref node of a declared symbol without having its flags set? Richard Henderson
02:27 Re: lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other Eric Fisher

September 15, 2005
23:48 Can we have a symbol_ref node of a declared symbol without having its flags set? Fariborz Jahanian
22:12 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Kaz Kojima
21:15 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Andreas Tobler
21:12 Duplicate dump file numbers Diego Novillo
20:21 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Robert Dewar
19:04 Re: RFC: dbxout_type rewrite Eric Christopher
18:37 Re: RFC: dbxout_type rewrite Andrew Pinski
18:26 RFC: dbxout_type rewrite Devang Patel
18:21 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Richard Henderson
18:07 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Dale Johannesen
17:43 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
16:53 Re: checksum files not ^C safe Mike Stump
16:41 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Joe Buck
16:14 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
16:13 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
16:10 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
15:58 Re: "TCP retransmission" in Downloading from GDB Giovanni Bajo
15:43 RE: "TCP retransmission" in Downloading from GDB Dave Korn
15:36 "TCP retransmission" in Downloading from GDB e . coullien
14:11 RE: lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other Dave Korn
14:05 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers? Alexandre Oliva
14:03 Re: checksum files not ^C safe Alexandre Oliva
13:25 Re: lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other Paul Brook
13:21 GCC 4.0.1 build succeeded using Fedora Core 4 Eduardo Restuccia
12:59 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Joseph S. Myers
11:24 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Robert Dewar
09:59 lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other Eric Fisher
07:17 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
06:55 Re: checksum files not ^C safe Geoffrey Keating
05:43 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Andreas Tobler
05:43 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Eric Christopher
05:12 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ian Lance Taylor
04:58 Re: where is the floatsidf? Ian Lance Taylor
04:51 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
04:50 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Andrew Pinski
03:56 where is the floatsidf? Eric Fisher
03:28 Re: where is the floatsidf? Ian Lance Taylor
03:24 where is the floatsidf? Eric Fisher
02:31 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Robert Dewar
01:21 RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency Dale Johannesen
01:11 Re: [gelato-gcc] Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itaniumvia Gelato Federation Shin-Ming Liu
00:47 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
00:32 checksum files not ^C safe Mike Stump

September 14, 2005
23:56 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
23:44 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
23:22 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Neil Booth
23:08 Tom Tromey as Java maintainer Per Bothner
22:53 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ian Lance Taylor
22:46 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Mike Stump
22:40 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
22:25 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Ross Ridge
22:07 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Joe Buck
21:47 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Laurent GUERBY
21:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Ulrich Weigand
20:51 proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76) Paul Eggert
20:02 Re: Symbolic replacement Andrew Pinski
19:53 Re: Symbolic replacement Richard Guenther
19:33 Re: Any plan to support Windows/x86-64? Christopher Faylor
19:18 RE: Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled? Gcc K6 testing account
19:18 RE: Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled? Dave Korn
19:10 Request link to www.devicetools.com Dave Scop
18:57 Re: Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled? Andrew Pinski
18:54 RE: Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled? Dave Korn
18:43 Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled? Gcc K6 testing account
18:29 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers? Joe Buck
17:36 Re: CFLAGS in one-tree style cross builds w/ newlib Ian Lance Taylor
17:16 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers? Alexandre Oliva
16:39 Re: regmove fixups vs pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
16:27 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation Robert Dewar
16:25 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Robert Dewar
16:06 Re: Corrupted CVS respository? Daniel Berlin
16:06 Symbolic replacement shreyas krishnan
16:00 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Diego Novillo
15:55 Corrupted CVS respository? H. J. Lu
15:55 On which platforms is -fvisibility supported? Jonathan Turkanis
15:54 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Larry Evans
15:31 Re: [gelato-gcc] Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation Wen-mei W. Hwu
15:13 GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available Mark Mitchell
13:51 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation Vladimir Makarov
13:20 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation Daniel Jacobowitz
13:15 Re: regmove fixups vs pseudos DJ Delorie
13:10 CFLAGS in one-tree style cross builds w/ newlib Ralf Corsepius
11:46 RE: var_args for rs6000 backend Yao qi
10:41 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Perret Yannick
10:40 Re: regmove fixups vs pseudos Giovanni Bajo
10:18 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Robert Dewar
10:10 RE: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Dave Korn
10:02 RE: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers? Dave Korn
09:22 Re: gccadmin's crontab Gerald Pfeifer
09:05 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation Steven Bosscher
08:54 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation Robert Dewar
08:36 Re: help: interfacing between C and fortran program Tobias Schlüter
08:06 Re: Loop information Zdenek Dvorak
07:56 Re: help: interfacing between C and fortran program Ingo Krabbe
06:40 help: interfacing between C and fortran program Gaurav Gautam, Noida
06:05 Re: regmove fixups vs pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
01:27 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers? Daniel Jacobowitz
00:55 gccadmin's crontab Joseph S. Myers
00:40 gcc-3.4-20050913 is now available gccadmin
00:37 regmove fixups vs pseudos DJ Delorie
00:17 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola

September 13, 2005
22:04 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1and MIPS... Nicholas Nethercote
21:40 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1and MIPS... Steven J. Hill
21:37 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1and MIPS... Steven J. Hill
21:12 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Daniel Berlin
21:04 The Next Dynamite stock? Chance
20:49 Re: rtl line no shreyas krishnan
20:38 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Rafael Espíndola
19:27 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible Mike Stump
19:23 coding style: type* variable or type *varible Rafael Espíndola
16:41 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation Mark Mitchell
16:28 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via GelatoFederation Gerald Pfeifer
16:26 Re: Any plan to support Windows/x86-64? Ross Ridge
16:23 Re: mirror question Gerald Pfeifer
15:26 GCC 4.0 branch frozen Mark Mitchell
12:43 Must mode of set and REG_EQUIV note match? Zdenek Dvorak
12:14 Re: [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga Segher Boessenkool
11:23 Re: [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga Alan Modra
10:57 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers? Paolo Carlini
10:45 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers? Paolo Carlini
10:22 When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers? chris jefferson
10:01 Re: [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga Segher Boessenkool
06:19 Loop information Rajkishore Barik
05:36 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1 and MIPS... Joe Buck
03:36 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1 and MIPS... Eric Christopher
03:31 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1and MIPS... Steven J. Hill
03:03 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1 and MIPS... Eric Christopher
02:18 Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1 andMIPS... Steven J. Hill

September 12, 2005
23:40 Re: Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated? Geoffrey Keating
21:54 Re: software floating point & machine descriptions Ian Lance Taylor
20:07 Re: Separating c++ parser Diego Novillo
20:04 Re: Separating c++ parser Karel Gardas
20:03 Re: Separating c++ parser Fariborz Jahanian
19:55 Re: Separating c++ parser Ashwin Bharambe
19:50 Re: Separating c++ parser Diego Novillo
19:30 Separating c++ parser Ashwin Bharambe
19:27 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Nix
19:07 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Mike Stump
18:45 Re: uncaught exception in g++ 3.4 and 4.0 Mark Mitchell
18:22 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation Mark Mitchell
18:04 RE: New port contribution - picoChip Dave Korn
18:01 Re: New port contribution - picoChip David Edelsohn
17:35 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Giovanni Bajo
17:27 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Joe Buck
17:08 RE: New port contribution - picoChip Dave Korn
17:01 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Steven Bosscher
16:56 Re: New port contribution - picoChip Giovanni Bajo
16:46 Any plan to support Windows/x86-64? H. J. Lu
15:44 Re: New port contribution - picoChip David Edelsohn
15:32 New port contribution - picoChip Daniel Towner
14:13 Re: Retested: RFA: fix PR middle-end/23290 Joern RENNECKE
13:36 SH patch applied (Was: Re: sh64 support deteriorating) Joern RENNECKE
12:53 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded Olivier Hainque
12:20 Re: sh64 support deteriorating Joern RENNECKE
09:34 failed to build libgfortran gcc-4.0.1 on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Rainer Emrich
07:34 software floating point & machine descriptions Eric Fisher
07:24 Re: Support for the MPC5554 in gcc ? Olivier Hainque

September 11, 2005
21:50 dead code in treelang/parse.y