Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion

[Ashwin Kolhe <ashwin dot kolhe at gmail dot com>]

On 8/25/05, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@lu.unisi.ch> wrote:
> I consider this to be less readable than the peep2 way to do it,
> especially if your peephole2 had three or four instructions.  And
> peep2_regno_dead_p uses an array (a circular buffer) so it's more
> efficient.  Indeed dead_or_set_p even has a loop inside it.
> 
> Paolo


Thanks a lot for ur help. can u give me a pointer to the origin of
peep2_reg_dead_p?

Regards,
Ashwin