Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support

[Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>]

DJ Delorie wrote:

> It sounds like you're interested in MinGW.  

Yes.  I'm particularly interested in the case of applications not built 
with GCC invoking GCC.  I can't control the invoker; only the invokee.

> If you really wanted > help MinGW users, you'd fix MinGW so that it 
supported these the same
> way that DJGPP and Cygwin do, for *all* MinGW applications, not just
> gcc.  I'd have to have to manually add this function call to each of
> the programs in binutils, gdb, sid, fileutils, coreutils, make, etc.
> That sounds like the wrong way to solve an OS problem.

I'm not sure how I can "fix MinGW"; see above.  Also, if a MinGW 
application wants to invoke some other Windows program, the behavior 
should be the same as if I compiled that application with Visual C, or 
Intel's C compiler, or whatever; if we were using magic to pass 
command-line arguments, we'd be breaking things.

We have the same OS problem in almost every UNIX, to one degree or 
another.  Older UNIX variants certainly had this problem in spades.  But 
it's not a big deal to me if people don't want this for systems other 
than MinGW, but I think we need it for MinGW.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304