This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Question about merging two instructions.



Do I always need to recognize the result?


validate_change and apply_change_group will take care of that.

If the answer is yes, than I suppose that if something bad happens,
the recognition will fail.


No, the problem is when recognition passes, and you have a SUBREG on the LHS that will only modify part of the pseudo. I can't think off the top of mind of a case, but I'd rather err on the side of safety.

It may still make sense changing the default case of simplify_replace_rtx to invoke replace_rtx rather than returning x. But this is unrelated, because nobody is currently passing a SET to simplify_replace_rtx (only expressions), and you should do the same: *you* said you want to replace on the RHS, so you really want to invoke simplify_replace_rtx on the RHS.

Paolo


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]