This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Lost gccbug submission
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 16:52 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
>
> | AFAICT (at least according to mail logs, etc) you are the only user of
>
> apparently, you've to count properly.
What?
You do read what i wrote, right?
I said you appear to be the only user of the *query* script, according
to the mail logs.
This is a true and factually correct statement.
No mail deliveries from people other than you to gcc-bugzilla-query have
been recorded in the past 3 weeks.
In the past few days, we have:
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775215 Aug 10 20:29
@4000000042fa63b9035ad16c.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775239 Aug 10 23:57
@4000000042fa947a2521da0c.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775335 Aug 11 03:47
@4000000042faca4f3a05fb24.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775305 Aug 11 09:21
@4000000042fb189303a80324.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775345 Aug 11 12:47
@4000000042fb48ed365ee06c.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775235 Aug 11 14:47
@4000000042fb651f1cfcb52c.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775342 Aug 11 17:00
@4000000042fb842f2adcffe4.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775308 Aug 11 20:59
@4000000042fbbc373429b0ec.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775382 Aug 12 02:13
@4000000042fc05c0149b94d4.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775307 Aug 12 08:34
@4000000042fc5f2522034874.s
-rwxr--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 16775296 Aug 12 12:36
@4000000042fc97da055f9664.s
-rw-r--r-- 1 qmaill qmail 15861633 Aug 12 15:01 current
-bash-2.05b$ grep gcc-bugzilla-query *
@4000000042fbbc373429b0ec.s:@4000000042fb98c03906f9e4 starting delivery
529997: msg 1372321 to local gcc-bugzilla-query@gcc.gnu.org
-bash-2.05b$
1 use.
And *that* was actually a spammer
@4000000042fb98c038758784 new msg 1372321
@4000000042fb98c038758f54 info msg 1372321: bytes 20231 from
<Morrisson@email.cnnsi.com> qp 12731 uid 22791
@4000000042fb98c03906e274 starting delivery 529996: msg 1372321 to local
gcc-testresults-owner@gcc.gnu.org
@4000000042fb98c03906f214 status: local 1/10 remote 2/255
@4000000042fb98c03906f9e4 starting delivery 529997: msg 1372321 to local
gcc-bugzilla-query@gcc.gnu.org
@4000000042fb98c03907059c status: local 2/10 remote 2/255
@4000000042fb98c0398cf6ac starting delivery 529998: msg 1372321 to local
gcc-bugs-index@gcc.gnu.org
@4000000042fb98c0398d1204 status: local 3/10 remote 2/255
@4000000042fb98c0398d19d4 starting delivery 529999: msg 1372321 to local
gcc-patches-thread.12345@gcc.gnu.org
@4000000042fb98c0398d258c status: local 4/10 remote 2/255
@4000000042fb98c039f1fa0c starting delivery 530000: msg 1372321 to local
gcc-patches-digest-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org
@4000000042fb98c039f2194c status: local 5/10 remote 2/255
@4000000042fb98c03a8930fc starting delivery 530001: msg 1372321 to local
gcc-get.123_145@gcc.gnu.org
@4000000042fb98c03a895424 status: local 6/10 remote 2/255
@4000000042fb98c03a9838a4 starting delivery 530002: msg 1372321 to local
gcc-patches-get.123_145@gcc.gnu.org
@4000000042fb98c03a985014 status: local 7/10 remote 2/255
@4000000042fb98c03b1b89d4 starting delivery 530003: msg 1372321 to local
gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org
....
This is just not a very used feature.
Sorry
--Dan