This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [autovect] Why all these redundant computations?

From: Sebastian Pop <sebastian dot pop at cri dot ensmp dot fr>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Dorit Naishlos <DORIT at il dot ibm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ira Rosen <IRAR at il dot ibm dot com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:04:50 +0200
Subject: Re: [autovect] Why all these redundant computations?
References: <OF5E73C6F8.674D4592-ONC2257050.004E1219-C2257050.004F7436@il.ibm.com> <1122907390.7576.3.camel@dyn9002218241>

Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 17:27 +0300, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> > 
> > I don't think there was an intention to force recomputation - probably just
> > overlooked what the third argument actually stands for. These occurrences
> > could probably be changed to false.
> > 
> 
> Yeah, i agree with dorit.
> The only other possible reason i can think of is that it fixed a bug
> somewhere due to not properly invalidating the cache, and that fix was
> just copied around.
> 

Okay, then I'll try to bootstrap and test with these flags passed to
false.

Thanks.

References:
- Re: [autovect] Why all these redundant computations?
  - From: Dorit Naishlos
- Re: [autovect] Why all these redundant computations?
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]