This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
re: Large, modular C++ application performance ...
- From: dank at kegel dot com
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: michael dot meeks at novell dot com
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:19:47 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: re: Large, modular C++ application performance ...
MM wrote in http://go-oo.org/~michael/OOoStartup.pdf:
"... not one slot was overridden by an implementation
method external to the implementing library."
Hmm. For some reason that reminds me of the 'final'
keyword which is periodically proposed
(e.g. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-02/msg01483.html).
Is this a situation where 'final' would have a benefit?