This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: could gfortran be tested on Darwin regress builds of 4.1?
- From: Peter O'Gorman <peter at pogma dot com>
- To: Bill Northcott <w dot northcott at internode dot on dot net>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu, geoffk at geoffk dot org
- Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:31:24 +0900
- Subject: Re: could gfortran be tested on Darwin regress builds of 4.1?
- References: <1122649613.12852.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org> <4F837438-B914-4C70-8740-5AB8DFD0FD68@internode.on.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bill Northcott wrote:
| On 30/07/2005, at 1:06 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
|
|> Well the gcc4.info for the package containing gfortran in fink has...
|
| The only thing I needed to add was gmp, which built from the source
| without problems.
|
| The cc-tools in Darwin 8 is 590. So I think it would be a bad idea to
| install 576!
Um, xcode-2.1 features cctools-590, darwin8 and Mac OS X 10.4.0, shipped
with cctools-576.
I too think that it would be great if Geoff could install gmp on the gcc
tester, but can understand his reasons for caution.
Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQuquO7iDAg3OZTLPAQIIYwP9Hd2I4B4RFNZTx0KdCWfxYz++WE+d3mn3
LYXN1tV7KqwrMKIkm/Nk+DIFg+71FR4/DphJl8MN6IDrHGnPzYuWnlVbX1QAj6UZ
x/wbPp/q+2/iezfSuTmtRvKmzRnN8sFgb0S1Yit3nVOwt+NsNNh1iD+TWN4QO86M
2cwTzjBPff8=
=rd/3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----