This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:18:34 -0700
Subject: Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves
References: <0f330882304cdfaf28ef9c2b1360380c@apple.com> <42E5EB70.8080303@lu.unisi.ch> <daac666e2edb10dc3b93d115abf833ca@apple.com> <d119913f08ea2dc79fe5d0f4b2851c78@apple.com>

On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:10:56PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> Yes, it is.  The following fixes my problem, and causes a couple of 
> 3DNow-specific regressions
> in the testsuite which I need to look at, but nothing serious; I think 
> it's gotten far enough to post
> for opinions.  This is intended to go on top of Paolo's patch
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01044.html
> It may, of course, run afoul of inaccuracies in the patterns on various 
> targets, haven't tried any performance testing yet.

Looks plausible.  Let us know what you wind up with wrt those
regressions and testing.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves
  - From: Dale Johannesen

References:
- rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves
  - From: Dale Johannesen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]