This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Chris Lattner <CLATTNER at apple dot com>
Cc: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:14:09 -0700
Subject: Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype
References: <F14404B1-D115-4737-8434-91BD20CBE65D@apple.com> <de065ef3f4bc5ae80c23b5cb12cf70b2@apple.com> <26CED3CF-3E03-4CD6-8FCB-01C43EA8ACCC@apple.com>

On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Understood.  I'm just looking for the minimum type alignment without  
> user alignment.  It appears that this is impossible to get from the  
> targets, due to the way the targets can override type alignments in  
> (almost completely) general ways.  Is this true?

For !STRICT_ALIGNMENT, there is no interesting minimum.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype
  - From: Chris Lattner

References:
- Minimum target alignment for a datatype
  - From: Chris Lattner
- Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype
  - From: Chris Lattner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]