This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org,Canqun Yang <canqun at nudt dot edu dot cn>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 03:36:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN
References: <20050720143531.A56FA53C536@ds20.nudt.edu.cn> <200507201622.54155.paul@codesourcery.com> <20050722024457.4B68453F7AB@ds20.nudt.edu.cn>

> > The biggest problem is type consistency and aliasing. Consider the
> > following
>
> I have several FORTRAN 77 programs. After inlining the small functions in
> them by hand, they made a great performance improvements. So I need a trial
> implementation of function inlining to verify the effectiveness of it.
>
> Now, my question is: If we just take the FORTRAN 77 syntax into account (no
> derived types, no complex aliasing), may it be simpler to implement
> function inlining for FORTRAN 77.

Maybe, but gfortran is a fortran 95 compiler so this is not an acceptable 
solution.

Paul

References:
- Function Inlining for FORTRAN
  - From: Canqun Yang
- Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN
  - From: Canqun Yang

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]