This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:32:21 -0700
- Subject: Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic
- References: <200507172119.j6HLJPd26676@makai.watson.ibm.com> <42DAD899.2090403@wanadoo.fr> <200507172332.j6HNWmd27626@makai.watson.ibm.com> <42DB3313.2070707@wanadoo.fr> <200507182101.j6IL1fd27934@makai.watson.ibm.com> <42DC9232.10807@wanadoo.fr> <42DCADC4.9030405@gmail.com> <1121793442.26802.69.camel@IBM-82ZWS052TEN.watson.ibm.com> <20050719173113.GA70268@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050719182051.GA4203@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:20:51AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:31:13AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Someone broke optimization of complex arithmetic. A 2005-06-01
> > mainline gives the expected answer. A 2005-06-15 mainline is
> > broken. I'll continue my binary search. Fortunately, building
> > gcc on a dual opteron system with 12 GB of memory goes fairly
> > quick.
>
> It's sure to be my complex reorg. You can quit searching and just
> file a bug.
>
Andrew Pinksia suggested the bug is the same as PR 22504,
so I've attached my Fortran 90 code to that PR.
--
Steve