This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
scheduling insn on none
- From: "Tabony, Charles" <ctabony at qualcomm dot com>
- To: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:32:52 -0700
- Subject: scheduling insn on none
Hi,
I am trying to add instruction scheduling to a machine description. I
added everything I think I need and the .dfa looks right to me, but when
I compile with -fsched-verbose=10 I get something that looks like this:
;; ======================================================
;; -- basic block 0 from 9 to 83 -- before reload
;; ======================================================
;; --------------- forward dependences: ------------
;; --- Region Dependences --- b 0 bb 0
;; insn code bb dep prio cost blockage units
;; ---- ---- -- --- ---- ---- -------- -----
;; 9 17 0 0 12 1 0 - 0 none : 83 10
;; 10 62 0 1 11 1 0 - 0 none : 83 33
32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12
;; 12 36 0 1 10 1 0 - 0 none : 83 13
;; 13 17 0 2 9 1 0 - 0 none : 83 33
;; 14 36 0 1 10 1 0 - 0 none : 83 15
;; 15 17 0 2 9 1 0 - 0 none : 83 33
;; 16 36 0 1 10 1 0 - 0 none : 83 17
(snip)
;; Ready list after queue_to_ready: 19 32 17 15 13
30 28 26 24 22 20
;; Ready list after ready_sort: 32 19 17 15 13 30
28 26 24 22 20
;; Ready list (t = 6): 32 19 17 15 13 30 28 26 24 22
20
;; --> scheduling insn <<<20>>> on unit none
;; dependences resolved: insn 21 into queue with cost=1
;; Ready-->Q: insn 21: queued for 1 cycles.
;; Ready list (t = 6): 32 19 17 15 13 30 28 26 24 22
;; Q-->Ready: insn 21: moving to ready without stalls
;; Ready list after queue_to_ready: 21 32 19 17 15
13 30 28 26 24 22
;; Ready list after ready_sort: 32 21 19 17 15 13
30 28 26 24 22
;; Ready list (t = 7): 32 21 19 17 15 13 30 28 26 24
22
;; --> scheduling insn <<<22>>> on unit none
;; dependences resolved: insn 23 into queue with cost=1
;; Ready-->Q: insn 23: queued for 1 cycles.
;; Ready list (t = 7): 32 21 19 17 15 13 30 28 26 24
;; Q-->Ready: insn 23: moving to ready without stalls
(snip)
What does it mean by "unit none"? Has anyone else encountered this
problem? What more information do you think you would need to diagnose
it? The port I am working on came from gcc 3.4.2.
Thank you,
Charles