This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3
- From: Christian Joensson <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:55:34 +0200
- Subject: Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3
- References: <5460e3330507060638380aac4c@mail.gmail.com> <200507061603.20147.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <42CBE6C0.604@suse.de> <42CBE865.7020600@suse.de> <5460e3330507060722723787a0@mail.gmail.com> <42CBECA5.6010102@suse.de> <5460e3330507060935663aafa0@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Christian Joensson <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>
On 7/6/05, Christian Joensson <christian.joensson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/6/05, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> wrote:
> > Christian Joensson wrote:
> >
> > >limiting this e-mail... I could also rebootstrap 4.0.0 if you think
> > >that'd be more useful... let me know what you would like...
> > >
> > Well, every possible independent check can be useful. Both
> > rebootstrapping 4.0.0 with your exact current machine certainly makes
> > sense (maybe it's obvious to you but for this kind of work, it suffices
> > a simple 'make' and only --enable-languages=c++, will take *a lot* less
> > time) and testing 4.0.1 with a machine as similar as possible to the one
> > you used at the time for 4.0.0.
> >
> > Also, of course I would like to see the libstdc++.log bits for the fails.
>
> so, 4.0.0 c++ only is on the way... and here's the relevant(?)
> libstdc++.log bits:
So, 4.0.0 testsuite posted at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00344.html
What would you like me to do now?
I could back off binutils to binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5 and rebootstrap
both 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 RC3 for c++ only...
--
Cheers,
/ChJ