Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3

[Christian Joensson <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>]

On 7/6/05, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 04:33:43PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >
> > >>Yes, I would definitely encourage a little more analysis. I'm rather
> > >>puzzled. We have got very nice testsuites on sparc-solaris and on
> > >>*-linux, in general, and those failures certainly are not expected.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >Is the
> > >
> > >FAIL: abi_check
> > >
> > >failure expected?  Should config/abi/sparc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt be
> > >somehow updated?
> > >
> > >
> > Yes, probably we should concentrate on that failure. It's the most
> > strange, probably, because Benjamin and Jakub (certainly a Sparc expert)
> > updated the sparc-linux baseline around mid of June. Maybe we should
> > involve Jakub too in the discussion, at least to confirm that on his
> > sparc-linux machines abi_check doesn't fail.
> 
> The best would be if Christian could post (bzip2ed) readelf -Ws of
> the libstdc++.so that fails the abi_check.

sure, attached, this is with HJ's binutils-2.16.90.0.3-1 for linux
tarball test release rpm built for corona.

again, would you rather I backed off to a binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5?

-- 
Cheers,

/ChJ

Attachment: libstdc++.so.6.0.5-readelf-Ws.log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data