This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3

Eric Botcazou wrote:

>>Yes, I would definitely encourage a little more analysis. I'm rather
>>puzzled. We have got very nice testsuites on sparc-solaris and on
>>*-linux, in general, and those failures certainly are not expected.
>>    
>>
>Is the
>
>FAIL: abi_check
>
>failure expected?  Should config/abi/sparc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt be 
>somehow updated?
>  
>
Yes, probably we should concentrate on that failure. It's the most
strange, probably, because Benjamin and Jakub (certainly a Sparc expert)
updated the sparc-linux baseline around mid of June. Maybe we should
involve Jakub too in the discussion, at least to confirm that on his
sparc-linux machines abi_check doesn't fail.

Jakub?

Paolo.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]