This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics?
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Paul Schlie <schlie at comcast dot net>
- Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:55:47 -0400
- Subject: Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics?
- References: <BEE7C89B.AA59%schlie@comcast.net>
> Overall, I guess I still simply believe the the first rule of optimization
> is to preserve existing semantics unless explicitly authorized otherwise,
> and then only if accompanied with corresponding warnings for all potentially
> behavior altering assumptions applied.
It is, you just believe that semantics exist where they don't.