This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Michael Veksler <VEKSLER at il dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:49:24 +0200
Subject: Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow
References: <OFD3D9025B.5DBCC2A3-ON4325702F.002AE087-4325702F.002EEDDD@il.ibm.com>

> This is unlike aliasing, when most lines of code out there,
> did not break aliasing rules (even before they were
> introduced).

Are you sure?  IIRC -fstrict-aliasing was once enabled at -O2 and then 
disabled to give people more time to fix their code.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow
  - From: Michael Veksler

References:
- The utility of standard's semantics for overflow
  - From: Michael Veksler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]