This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics?
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Yes, we should document this. In general, implementation defined
> aspects (and some of the undefined behaviour aspects) are missing
> documentation for C++ -- JSM did some work for that for C.
Is there a convenient checklist for C++ similar to C99's Annex J.3 and
J.4, or is it necessary to go through the whole standard to find what
needs documenting?
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)