This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics?

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Michael Veksler <VEKSLER at il dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:07:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics?
References: <OFEA870A13.7DE2D1DD-ON4325702E.00578B85-4325702E.0057B902@il.ibm.com>

On Jun 28, 2005, at 11:58 AM, Michael Veksler wrote:


Sorry, did not realize this was documented this way.
Is "implement-c.texi" part of the user visible documentation, or is it
targeted for gcc developers?

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Implementation.html#C-Implementation

in the normal user visible documentation.

-- Pinski

References:
- Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics?
  - From: Michael Veksler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]